Two differet self-propulsion types of Janus microspheres: from the comparative experiments and driving mechanisms

被引:3
|
作者
Wang Lei-Lei [1 ]
Cui Hai-Hang [1 ]
Jing, Zhang [1 ]
Xu, Zheng [2 ]
Lei, Wang [1 ]
Li, Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab Nonlinear Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Janus microsphere; self-diffusiophoresis; bubble self-propulsion; slip boundary; MOTORS;
D O I
10.7498/aps.65.220201
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
A Janus particle is a general term for a non-uniform particle that has different properties on different sides of particle. For a Pt-SiO2 type of Janus microsphere, Pt side serves as the catalysis surface to decompose H2O2 solution, leading to the self-propulsion motion of particle. In this paper, the relevant experimental phenomena in two driven modes are compared first. The results show that under the same concentration of solution, the microsphere with a diameter of about 1 mu m experiences self-diffusiophoresis propulsion; whereas, the one with an about 20 mu m diameter experiences bubble self-propulsion. Significant differences in motional trajectory and propulsion velocity are found between them. Then, the dominated physical factors are analyzed and the multi-field coupling numerical model is constructed based on the simplified force balance analysis. Subsequently, the velocity field distribution and O-2 concentration distribution around Janus microsphere are also studied. According to these studies, we explain the position and size of the bubble generated. Further more, we infer that the wall slip coefficient is a key matching parameter in the numerical model, and two slip coefficients with a difference of an order of magnitude are given corresponding to the two types of self-propulsion modes. Then we explain the possible mechanism for the changes of wall slip coefficient under different particle sizes. The present study is beneficial to the in-depth exploration of the self-propulsion mechanism and also provides the theoretical foundation for improving the performance of self-propellant device.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] [胡静 Hu Jing], 2014, [水动力学研究与进展. A辑, Chinese Journal of Hydrodynomics], V29, P377
  • [12] Perspective: Nanomotors without moving parts that propel themselves in solution
    Kapral, Raymond
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 138 (02):
  • [13] Bubble-Propelled Microjets: Model and Experiment
    Manjare, Manoj
    Yang, Bo
    Zhao, Y-P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2013, 117 (09): : 4657 - 4665
  • [14] Bubble Driven Quasioscillatory Translational Motion of Catalytic Micromotors
    Manjare, Manoj
    Yang, Bo
    Zhao, Y. -P.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2012, 109 (12)
  • [15] Catalytically induced electrokinetics for motors and micropumps
    Paxton, Walter F.
    Baker, Paul T.
    Kline, Timothy R.
    Wang, Yang
    Mallouk, Thomas E.
    Sen, Ayusman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 128 (46) : 14881 - 14888
  • [16] Selecting the Swimming Mechanisms of Colloidal Particles: Bubble Propulsion versus Self-Diffusiophoresis
    Wang, Sijia
    Wu, Ning
    [J]. LANGMUIR, 2014, 30 (12) : 3477 - 3486
  • [17] Understanding the Efficiency of Autonomous Nano- and Microscale Motors
    Wang, Wei
    Chiang, Tso-Yi
    Velegol, Darrell
    Mallouk, Thomas E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 135 (28) : 10557 - 10565
  • [18] [武美玲 Wu Meiling], 2014, [水动力学研究与进展. A辑, Chinese Journal of Hydrodynomics], V29, P274
  • [19] Simulation of diffusiophoresis force and the confinement effect of Janus particles with the continuum method
    Wu, Meiling
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Zheng, Xu
    Cui, Haihang
    [J]. AIP ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (03)
  • [20] Non-Gaussian statistics for the motion of self-propelled Janus particles: Experiment versus theory
    Zheng, Xu
    ten Hagen, Borge
    Kaiser, Andreas
    Wu, Meiling
    Cui, Haihang
    Silber-Li, Zhanhua
    Loewen, Hartmut
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 88 (03):