Barriers and facilitators and the need for a clinical guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing in the hospital: a qualitative and quantitative study

被引:8
|
作者
Bogers, Saskia J. [1 ]
van Daalen, Frederike, V [1 ]
Kuil, Sacha D. [2 ]
de Jong, Menno D. [2 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Microbiol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Antibiotic stewardship programmes; Clinical guidelines; Antimicrobial resistance; Microbiological diagnostic testing; Infectious diseases; Barriers and facilitators; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES-SOCIETY; FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW; ADULT PATIENTS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PROGRAM; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-019-03516-z
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The appropriate use of microbiological investigations is an important cornerstone of antibiotic stewardship programmes, but receives relatively limited attention. This study aimed to identify influencing factors in performing microbiological diagnostic tests and to assess the need for a clinical guideline. We performed a qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (online questionnaire survey) study among medical specialists and residents to identify physicians' considerations in performing microbiological diagnostic tests and to assess the need for a diagnostic guideline. The questionnaire consisted of 14 statements, divided into three categories: knowledge, influencing factors and presence of guidelines. The questionnaire was sent to physicians of the departments of internal medicine, intensive care, paediatrics and pulmonology in five hospitals in the Netherlands. Sub-analyses for medical specialists versus residents and for paediatric versus non-paediatric departments were performed. We included 187 completed questionnaires in our analyses. The physicians reported having adequate knowledge on methods, time-to-result and accuracy, but inadequate knowledge on costs of the tests. Patients' clinical condition, comorbidity, local guidelines and accuracy of tests were appraised as the four most important influencing factors to perform tests. Over 70% (132/187) of physicians reported being interested in a guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing. Fifteen physicians (8.0%) provided additional comments. This study identifies the influencing factors to microbiological testing and shows the demand for a clinical guideline among physicians. Importance Microbiological diagnostic tests are an important cornerstone within antibiotic stewardship programmes [1-5]. These programmes aim to ameliorate the appropriate use of antibiotics and thus improve clinical outcomes of infectious diseases, whilst reducing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance [6]. However, inappropriate microbiological testing is a widely recognised problem [7-12], and influencing factors to testing have not been studied in the past. Our research shows the demand for a clinical guideline among physicians, and it identifies their influencing factors to testing. These results can be used to create a clinical guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing, thus supporting antibiotic stewardship programmes and reducing antimicrobial resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 920
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO CLINICAL ACTIVITY INDICES FOR IBD IN ROUTINE PRACTICE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Razanskaite, Violeta
    Young, Bridget
    Williamson, Paula
    Bodger, Keith
    GUT, 2021, 70 : A86 - A87
  • [42] Barriers and facilitators in developing patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - qualitative interviews on experiences of international guideline producers
    Nora Meyer
    Julia Hauprich
    Jessica Breuing
    Irma Hellbrecht
    Sarah Wahlen
    Nadja Könsgen
    Stefanie Bühn
    Monika Becker
    Susanne Blödt
    Günther Carl
    Markus Follmann
    Stefanie Frenz
    Thomas Langer
    Monika Nothacker
    Corinna Schaefer
    Dawid Pieper
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [43] Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in cancer clinical trials - Qualitative study of the perspectives of clinical research associates
    Grunfeld, E
    Zitzelsberger, L
    Coristine, M
    Aspelund, F
    CANCER, 2002, 95 (07) : 1577 - 1583
  • [44] Barriers and facilitators to consulting hospital clinical ethics committees
    Gaudine, Alice
    Lamb, Marianne
    LeFort, Sandra M.
    Thorne, Linda
    NURSING ETHICS, 2011, 18 (06) : 767 - 780
  • [45] Barriers and facilitators of readiness for hospital discharge in patients with myocardial infarction: a qualitative study: quality improvement study
    Monfared, Arezoo
    Javadi-Pashaki, Nazila
    Dehghan Nayeri, Nahid
    Jafaraghaee, Fateme
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 86 (04): : 1967 - 1976
  • [46] Collaborative model of intrapartum care: qualitative study on barriers and facilitators to implementation in a private Brazilian hospital
    Colomar, Mercedes
    Gonzalez Mora, Franco
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Opiyo, Newton
    Bohren, Meghan A.
    Torloni, Maria Regina
    Siaulys, Monica
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [47] BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO COUPLES HIV TESTING AND COUNSELLING AND VIEWS ON INCENTIVES FOR COUPLES TESTING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY FROM ZIMBABWE
    Sibanda, E. L.
    Makamba, M.
    Hatzold, K.
    Cowan, F. M.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2015, 91 : A228 - A228
  • [48] Barriers and facilitators to implementing a nursing clinical decision support system in a tertiary hospital setting: A qualitative study using the FITT framework
    Zhai, Yue
    Yu, Zhenghong
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, YuXia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 166
  • [49] Barriers and facilitators to guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a qualitative descriptive study
    Min Meng
    Jiale Hu
    Xiao Liu
    Min Tian
    Wenjuan Lei
    Enmei Liu
    Zhu Han
    Qiu Li
    Yaolong Chen
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [50] PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis
    Magwood, Olivia
    Riddle, Alison
    Petkovic, Jennifer
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Khabsa, Joanne
    Atwere, Pearl
    Akl, Elie A.
    Campbell, Pauline
    Welch, Vivian
    Smith, Maureen
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Limburg, Heather
    Dans, Leonila F.
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Grant, Sean
    Concannon, Tom
    Tugwell, Peter
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02)