Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling

被引:47
|
作者
Odibo, Anthony O. [1 ]
Dicke, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Gray, Diana L. [1 ]
Oberle, Barbara [1 ]
Stamilio, David M. [1 ]
Macones, George A. [1 ]
Crane, James P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med Ultrasound & Genet, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2008年 / 112卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181875b92
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the fetal loss rate in our center and evaluate the risk factors associated with such losses after chorionic villus sampling (CVS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all women undergoing chorionic villus sampling and a control group that had no invasive procedure at a single center over a 16-year period. Fetal loss was defined as any loss before 24 weeks of gestation. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to compare pregnancies resulting in fetal loss to those without a loss and to adjust for potential confounders between the groups. RESULTS: Of 5,243 women who had CVS who were compared with 4,917 women seen before 14 weeks who had no invasive procedure, there were 138 (2.7%) fetal losses before 24 weeks of gestation in the CVS group compared with 161 (3.3%) in the control group (relative risk 0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.0). The difference in loss rate of -0.7% (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 1.3) between the CVS group and those who had no procedure was not statistically significant at P<.05. The significant risk factors for fetal loss were African-American maternal race, at least two aspirations/needle insertions, heavy bleeding during CVS, maternal age younger than 25 years, and gestational age at performing CVS before 10 weeks. CONCLUSION: The estimated fetal loss rate after CVS was not significantly different from the group that had no procedure. Significant predictors of fetal loss after CVS were identified, but the accuracy of the final model for predicting fetal loss was only modest.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 819
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Hopkins, Linda M.
    Norton, Mary E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03): : 612 - 616
  • [22] PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS - FETAL DEVELOPMENT AFTER CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    RODECK, CH
    LANCET, 1993, 341 (8843): : 468 - 469
  • [23] FETAL GENETIC DIAGNOSIS BY CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    JACKSON, LG
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 15 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF FETAL LOSS AFTER TRANS-CERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING - A REVIEW OF 719 PATIENTS
    WADE, RV
    YOUNG, SR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (03) : 513 - 519
  • [25] CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING - EVALUATING SAFETY AND EFFICACY
    MODELL, B
    LANCET, 1985, 1 (8431): : 737 - 740
  • [26] THE ROLE OF ABNORMAL FETAL HEART-RATE IN SCHEDULING CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    YAGEL, S
    ANTEBY, E
    RON, M
    HOCHNERCELNIKIER, D
    ACHIRON, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (09): : 739 - 740
  • [27] PREGNANCY LOSS AFTER AMNIOCENTESIS AND CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING: COHORT STUDY
    Paljk Likar, Ivana
    Slavec Jere, Ksenija
    Mozina, Teja
    Verdenik, Ivan
    Tul, Natasa
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2021, 60 (01): : 25 - 29
  • [28] SAMPLING SUCCESS AND RISK BY TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING, TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS - A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SMIDTJENSEN, S
    PERMIN, M
    PHILIP, J
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) : 86 - 90
  • [29] Risk of fetal mosaicism when placental mosaicism is diagnosed by chorionic villus sampling
    Phillips, OP
    Tharapel, AT
    Lerner, JL
    Park, VM
    Wachtel, SS
    Shulman, LP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (03) : 850 - 855
  • [30] RISK OF FETAL MOSAICISM WHEN PLACENTAL MOSAICISM IS DIAGNOSED BY CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    PHILLIPS, OP
    THARAPEL, AT
    PARK, VM
    WACHTEL, SS
    SHULMAN, LP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1995, 57 (04) : 1667 - 1667