AS-TRUST: A Trust Quantification Scheme for Autonomous Systems in BGP

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Jian [1 ]
Venkatasubramanian, Krishna K. [1 ]
West, Andrew G. [1 ]
Kannan, Sampath [1 ]
Loo, Boon Thau [1 ]
Sokolsky, Oleg [1 ]
Lee, Insup [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, 200 S 33Rd St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) works by frequently exchanging updates that disseminate reachability information about IP prefixes (i.e., IP address blocks) between Autonomous Systems (ASes) on the Internet. The ideal operation of BGP relies on three major behavioral assumptions (BAs): (1) information contained in the update is legal and correct, (2) a route to a prefix is stable, and (3) the route adheres to the valley free routing policy. The current operation of BGP implicitly trusts all ASes to adhere to these assumptions. However, several documented violation of these assumptions attest to the fact that such an assumption of trust is perilous. This paper presents AS-TRUST, a scheme that comprehensively characterizes the trustworthiness of ASes with respect to their adherence of the behavioral assumptions. AS-TRUST quantifies trust using the notion of AS reputation. To compute reputation, AS-TRUST analyzes updates received in the past. It then classifies the resulting observations into multiple types of feedback. The feedback is used by a reputation function that uses Bayesian statistics to compute a probabilistic view of AS trustworthiness. This information can then be used for improving quotidian BGP operation by enabling improved route preference and dampening decision making at the ASes. Our implementation of AS-TRUST scheme using publicly available BGP traces demonstrates: (1) the number of ASes involved in violating the BGP behavioral assumptions is significant, and (2) the proposed reputation mechanism provides multi-fold improvement in the ability of ASes to operate in the presence of BA violations.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 276
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] No Quistclose trust in investment scheme
    Goldsworth, John
    TRUSTS & TRUSTEES, 2007, 13 (10) : 611 - 612
  • [42] Obtaining Trust in Autonomous Systems: Tools for Formal Model Synthesis and Validation
    Heitmeyer, Constance L.
    Leonard, Elizabeth I.
    2015 IEEE/ACM 3RD FME WORKSHOP ON FORMAL METHODS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2015, : 54 - 60
  • [43] Trust, but Verify: Autonomous Robot Trust Modeling in Human-Robot Collaboration
    Alhaji, Basel
    Prilla, Michael
    Rausch, Andreas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION, HAI 2021, 2021, : 402 - 406
  • [44] Can We Trust Autonomous Weapons?
    Kirkpatrick, Keith
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (12) : 27 - 29
  • [45] Trust in AI in Autonomous Driving Vehicles
    Lian, Ru
    Siau, Keng
    AMCIS 2020 PROCEEDINGS, 2020,
  • [46] Drivers Quickly Trust Autonomous Cars
    Brostrom, Robert
    Rydstrom, Annie
    Kopp, Christoffer
    ADVANCES IN USABILITY, USER EXPERIENCE AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 794 : 699 - 705
  • [47] A Case Study of Trust on Autonomous Driving
    Sheng, Shili
    Pakdamanian, Erfan
    Han, Kyungtae
    Kim, BaekGyu
    Tiwari, Prashant
    Kim, Inki
    Feng, Lu
    2019 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2019, : 4368 - 4373
  • [48] BGP-XM: BGP eXtended Multipath for transit Autonomous Systems
    Camacho, Jose M.
    Garcia-Martinez, Alberto
    Bagnulo, Marcelo
    Valera, Francisco
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2013, 57 (04) : 954 - 975
  • [49] Engaging the Dynamics of Trust in Computational Trust and Reputation Systems
    Danek, Agnieszka
    Urbano, Joana
    Rocha, Ana Paula
    Oliveira, Eugenio
    AGENT AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6070 : 22 - +
  • [50] To trust or not to trust? An assessment of trust in AI-based systems: Concerns, ethics and contexts
    Omrani, Nessrine
    Rivieccio, Giorgia
    Fiore, Ugo
    Schiavone, Francesco
    Agreda, Sergio Garcia
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 181