AS-TRUST: A Trust Quantification Scheme for Autonomous Systems in BGP

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Jian [1 ]
Venkatasubramanian, Krishna K. [1 ]
West, Andrew G. [1 ]
Kannan, Sampath [1 ]
Loo, Boon Thau [1 ]
Sokolsky, Oleg [1 ]
Lee, Insup [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, 200 S 33Rd St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) works by frequently exchanging updates that disseminate reachability information about IP prefixes (i.e., IP address blocks) between Autonomous Systems (ASes) on the Internet. The ideal operation of BGP relies on three major behavioral assumptions (BAs): (1) information contained in the update is legal and correct, (2) a route to a prefix is stable, and (3) the route adheres to the valley free routing policy. The current operation of BGP implicitly trusts all ASes to adhere to these assumptions. However, several documented violation of these assumptions attest to the fact that such an assumption of trust is perilous. This paper presents AS-TRUST, a scheme that comprehensively characterizes the trustworthiness of ASes with respect to their adherence of the behavioral assumptions. AS-TRUST quantifies trust using the notion of AS reputation. To compute reputation, AS-TRUST analyzes updates received in the past. It then classifies the resulting observations into multiple types of feedback. The feedback is used by a reputation function that uses Bayesian statistics to compute a probabilistic view of AS trustworthiness. This information can then be used for improving quotidian BGP operation by enabling improved route preference and dampening decision making at the ASes. Our implementation of AS-TRUST scheme using publicly available BGP traces demonstrates: (1) the number of ASes involved in violating the BGP behavioral assumptions is significant, and (2) the proposed reputation mechanism provides multi-fold improvement in the ability of ASes to operate in the presence of BA violations.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 276
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust Quantification for Autonomous Medical Advisory Systems
    Thomas, Mini
    Samavi, Reza
    Doyle, Thomas E.
    2021 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIVACY, SECURITY AND TRUST (PST), 2021,
  • [2] A Survey on Trust in Autonomous Systems
    Shahrdar, Shervin
    Menezes, Luiza
    Nojoumian, Mehrdad
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, VOL 2, 2019, 857 : 368 - 386
  • [3] Autonomous Systems, Trust, and Guarantees
    TaheriNejad, Nima
    Herkersdorf, Andreas
    Jantsch, Axel
    IEEE DESIGN & TEST, 2022, 39 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [4] Trust in Autonomous Systems-iTrust Lab Future Directions for Analysis of Trust With Autonomous Systems
    Nahavandi, Saeid
    IEEE SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS MAGAZINE, 2019, 5 (03): : 52 - 59
  • [5] Trust and resilient autonomous driving systems
    Adam Henschke
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2020, 22 : 81 - 92
  • [6] Trust and resilient autonomous driving systems
    Henschke, Adam
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 22 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [7] Assertions signcryption scheme in decentralized autonomous trust environments
    Zhang, Mingwu
    Yang, Bo
    Zhu, Shenglin
    Zhang, Wenzheng
    AUTONOMIC AND TRUSTED COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5060 : 516 - +
  • [8] Building trust over intelligence for autonomous systems
    Brichni, Marwa
    el Gattoufi, Said
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ASSURANCE AND SECURITY, 2020, 15 (02): : 53 - 64
  • [9] A Survey on Trust Metrics for Autonomous Robotic Systems
    DiLuoffo, Vincenzo
    Michalson, William R.
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING, 2023, 3 (01): : 895 - 946
  • [10] TRUST AND AUTONOMOUS AGENCY
    Oshana, Marina
    RES PHILOSOPHICA, 2014, 91 (03) : 431 - 447