A Comparison of Different Many-Objective Optimization Algorithms for Energy System Optimization

被引:6
|
作者
Rodemann, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Honda Res Inst Europe, Carl Legien Str 30, D-63073 Offenbach, Germany
关键词
Many-objective optimization; Energy management; Desirabilities; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-16692-2_1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The usage of renewable energy sources, storage devices, and flexible loads has the potential to greatly improve the overall efficiency of a building complex or factory. However, one needs to consider a multitude of upgrade options and several performance criteria. We therefore formulated this task as a many-objective optimization problem with 10 design parameters and 5 objectives (investment cost, yearly energy costs, CO2 emissions, system resilience, and battery lifetime). Our target was to investigate the variations in the outputs of different optimization algorithms. For this we tested several many-objective optimization algorithms in terms of their hypervolume performance and the practical relevance of their results. We found substantial performance variations between the algorithms, both regarding hypervolume and in the basic distribution of solutions in objective space. Also the concept of desirabilities was employed to better visualize and assess the quality of solutions found.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 18
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Many-Objective Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (MaOGOA): A New Many-Objective Optimization Technique for Solving Engineering Design Problems
    Kalita, Kanak
    Jangir, Pradeep
    Cep, Robert
    Pandya, Sundaram B.
    Abualigah, Laith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [42] Ensemble of many-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems
    Zhou, Yalan
    Wang, Jiahai
    Chen, Jian
    Gao, Shangce
    Teng, Luyao
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (09) : 2407 - 2419
  • [43] Pareto Dominance-Based Algorithms With Ranking Methods for Many-Objective Optimization
    Palakonda, Vikas
    Mallipeddi, Rammohan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 11043 - 11053
  • [44] Comparing Solution Sets of Different Size in Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    Masuda, Hiroyuki
    Nojima, Yusuke
    2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2015, : 2859 - 2866
  • [45] Set-based Genetic Algorithms for Solving Many-objective Optimization Problems
    Gong, Dunwei
    Wang, Gengxing
    Sun, Xiaoyan
    2013 13TH UK WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (UKCI), 2013, : 96 - 103
  • [46] A Performance Comparison Indicator for Pareto Front Approximations in Many-Objective Optimization
    Li, Miqing
    Yang, Shengxiang
    Liu, Xiaohui
    GECCO'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2015, : 703 - 710
  • [47] On the Performance Degradation of Dominance-Based Evolutionary Algorithms in Many-Objective Optimization
    Santos, Thiago
    Takahashi, Ricardo H. C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2018, 22 (01) : 19 - 31
  • [48] Physical Topology Design of Optical Networks Aided by Many-Objective Optimization Algorithms
    Figueiredo, Elliackin M. N.
    Araujo, Danilo R. B.
    Bastos-Filho, Carmelo J. A.
    Ludermir, Teresa B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 5TH BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2016), 2016, : 409 - 414
  • [49] Ensemble of many-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems
    Yalan Zhou
    Jiahai Wang
    Jian Chen
    Shangce Gao
    Luyao Teng
    Soft Computing, 2017, 21 : 2407 - 2419
  • [50] Using reference points to update the archive of MOPSO algorithms in Many-Objective Optimization
    Britto, Andre
    Pozo, Aurora
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2014, 127 : 78 - 87