The Solar Wind Angular Momentum Flux as Observed by Parker Solar Probe

被引:11
|
作者
Finley, Adam J. [1 ]
Matt, Sean P. [1 ]
Reville, Victor [2 ]
Pinto, Rui F. [2 ,3 ]
Owens, Mathew [4 ]
Kasper, Justin C. [5 ,6 ]
Korreck, Kelly E. [6 ]
Case, A. W. [6 ]
Stevens, Michael L. [6 ]
Whittlesey, Phyllis [7 ]
Larson, Davin [7 ]
Livi, Roberto [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QL, Devon, England
[2] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, IRAP, CNRS, CNES, Toulouse, France
[3] CEA Saclay, Dept Astrophys, Lab AIM, DRF,IRFU, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[4] Univ Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Smithsonian Astrophys Observ, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
英国科学技术设施理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Solar wind; Stellar rotation; Solar rotation; Solar evolution; Stellar evolution; Stellar physics; Solar physics; LATE-TYPE STARS; MAGNETIC BRAKING; EVOLUTION; ROTATION; FIELD; MODEL; SUN;
D O I
10.3847/2041-8213/abb9a5
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The long-term evolution of the Sun's rotation period cannot be directly observed, and is instead inferred from trends in the measured rotation periods of other Sun-like stars. Assuming the Sun spins down as it ages, following rotation rate proportional to age(-1/2), requires the current solar angular momentum (AM) loss rate to be around 6 x 10(30)erg. Magnetohydrodynamic models, and previous observations of the solar wind (from the Helios and Wind spacecraft), generally predict a values closer to 1 x 10(30)erg or 3 x 10(30)erg, respectively. Recently, the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) observed tangential solar wind speeds as high as similar to 50 km s(-1)in a localized region of the inner heliosphere. If such rotational flows were prevalent throughout the corona, it would imply that the solar wind AM-loss rate is an order of magnitude larger than all of those previous estimations. In this Letter, we evaluate the AM flux in the solar wind, using data from the first two orbits of PSP. The solar wind is observed to contain both large positive (as seen during perihelion), and negative AM fluxes. We analyze two solar wind streams that were repeatedly traversed by PSP; the first is a slow wind stream whose average AM flux fluctuates between positive and negative values, and the second is an intermediate speed stream that contains a positive AM flux (more consistent with a constant flow of AM). When the data from PSP are evaluated holistically, the average equatorial AM flux implies a global AM-loss rate of around (2.6-4.2) x 10(30)erg (which is more consistent with observations from previous spacecraft).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] ANGULAR MOMENTUM OF SOLAR WIND
    SCHUBERT, G
    COLEMAN, PJ
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 153 (3P1): : 943 - &
  • [12] Characteristics and Source Regions of Slow Alfvénic Solar Wind Observed by Parker Solar Probe
    Ervin, Tamar
    Jaffarove, Kai
    Badman, Samuel T.
    Huang, Jia
    Rivera, Yeimy J.
    Bale, Stuart D.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 975 (02):
  • [13] Density Fluctuations in the Solar Wind Based on Type III Radio Bursts Observed by Parker Solar Probe
    Krupar, Vratislav
    Szabo, Adam
    Maksimovic, Milan
    Kruparova, Oksana
    Kontar, Eduard P.
    Balmaceda, Laura A.
    Bonnin, Xavier
    Bale, Stuart D.
    Pulupa, Marc
    Malaspina, David M.
    Bonnell, John W.
    Harvey, Peter R.
    Goetz, Keith
    de Wit, Thierry Dudok
    MacDowall, Robert J.
    Kasper, Justin C.
    Case, Anthony W.
    Korreck, Kelly E.
    Larson, Davin E.
    Livi, Roberto
    Stevens, Michael L.
    Whittlesey, Phyllis L.
    Hegedus, Alexander M.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2020, 246 (02):
  • [14] Solar wind energy flux observations in the inner heliosphere: first results from Parker Solar Probe
    Liu, M.
    Issautier, K.
    Meyer-Vernet, N.
    Moncuquet, M.
    Maksimovic, M.
    Halekas, J. S.
    Huang, J.
    Griton, L.
    Bale, S.
    Bonnell, J. W.
    Case, A. W.
    Goetz, K.
    Harvey, P. R.
    Kasper, J. C.
    MacDowall, R. J.
    Malaspina, D. M.
    Pulupa, M.
    Stevens, M. L.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2021, 650
  • [15] Editorial: Solar Wind at the Dawn of the Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter Era
    Lapenta, Giovanni
    Zhukov, Andrei
    van Driel-Gesztelyi, Lidia
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2020, 295 (07)
  • [16] Editorial: Solar Wind at the Dawn of the Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter Era
    Giovanni Lapenta
    Andrei Zhukov
    Lidia van Driel-Gesztelyi
    Solar Physics, 2020, 295
  • [17] Energy Supply for Heating the Slow Solar Wind Observed by Parker Solar Probe between 0.17 and 0.7 au
    Wu, Honghong
    Tu, Chuanyi
    Wang, Xin
    He, Jiansen
    Yang, Liping
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 904 (01)
  • [18] Enhanced Energy Transfer Rate in Solar Wind Turbulence Observed near the Sun from Parker Solar Probe
    Bandyopadhyay, Riddhi
    Goldstein, M. L.
    Maruca, B. A.
    Matthaeus, W. H.
    Parashar, T. N.
    Ruffolo, D.
    Chhiber, R.
    Usmanov, A.
    Chasapis, A.
    Qudsi, R.
    Bale, Stuart D.
    Bonnell, J. W.
    de Wit, Thierry Dudok
    Goetz, Keith
    Harvey, Peter R.
    MacDowall, Robert J.
    Malaspina, David M.
    Pulupa, Marc
    Kasper, J. C.
    Korreck, K. E.
    Case, A. W.
    Stevens, M.
    Whittlesey, P.
    Larson, D.
    Livi, R.
    Klein, K. G.
    Velli, M.
    Raouafi, N.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2020, 246 (02):
  • [19] Subproton-scale Intermittency in Near-Sun Solar Wind Turbulence Observed by the Parker Solar Probe
    Chhiber, Rohit
    Matthaeus, William H.
    Bowen, Trevor A.
    Bale, Stuart D.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2021, 911 (01)
  • [20] Turbulence and Waves in the Sub-Alfvenic Solar Wind Observed by the Parker Solar Probe during Encounter 10
    Zhao, L. -L.
    Zank, G. P.
    Adhikari, L.
    Telloni, D.
    Stevens, M.
    Kasper, J. C.
    Bale, S. D.
    Raouafi, N. E.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2022, 934 (02)