Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas

被引:118
|
作者
Shen, Xuemei [1 ]
Hu, Hongbo [1 ]
Peng, Huasong [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Xuehong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Life Sci & Biotechnol, State Key Lab Microbial Metab, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2013年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; Pseudomonad; Comparative genomics; Environmental adaptability; Rhizosphere colonization; Biocontrol activity; BETA-KETOADIPATE PATHWAY; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; OXIDATIVE STRESS; EFFLUX SYSTEM; GENE-CLUSTER; MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION; PYRROLOQUINOLINE-QUINONE; FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS; NITROGEN-FIXATION; CHLORORAPHIS GP72;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-14-271
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Some Pseudomonas strains function as predominant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Within this group, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas fluorescens are non-pathogenic biocontrol agents, and some Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are PGPR. P. chlororaphis GP72 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with a fully sequenced genome. We conducted a genomic analysis comparing GP72 with three other pseudomonad PGPR: P. fluorescens Pf-5, P. aeruginosa M18, and the nitrogen-fixing strain P. stutzeri A1501. Our aim was to identify the similarities and differences among these strains using a comparative genomic approach to clarify the mechanisms of plant growth-promoting activity. Results: The genome sizes of GP72, Pf-5, M18, and A1501 ranged from 4.6 to 7.1 M, and the number of protein-coding genes varied among the four species. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) analysis assigned functions to predicted proteins. The COGs distributions were similar among the four species. However, the percentage of genes encoding transposases and their inactivated derivatives (COG L) was 1.33% of the total genes with COGs classifications in A1501, 0.21% in GP72, 0.02% in Pf-5, and 0.11% in M18. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that GP72 and Pf-5 were the most closely related strains, consistent with the genome alignment results. Comparisons of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) between GP72 and Pf-5 revealed 3544 conserved genes. There were fewer conserved genes when GP72 CDSs were compared with those of A1501 and M18. Comparisons among the four Pseudomonas species revealed 603 conserved genes in GP72, illustrating common plant growth-promoting traits shared among these PGPR. Conserved genes were related to catabolism, transport of plant-derived compounds, stress resistance, and rhizosphere colonization. Some strain-specific CDSs were related to different kinds of biocontrol activities or plant growth promotion. The GP72 genome contained the cus operon (related to heavy metal resistance) and a gene cluster involved in type IV pilus biosynthesis, which confers adhesion ability. Conclusions: Comparative genomic analysis of four representative PGPR revealed some conserved regions, indicating common characteristics (metabolism of plant-derived compounds, heavy metal resistance, and rhizosphere colonization) among these pseudomonad PGPR. Genomic regions specific to each strain provide clues to its lifestyle, ecological adaptation, and physiological role in the rhizosphere.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BIOTECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF SOYBEAN PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA
    de Paula, Gabriel Ferreira
    Demetrio, Gilberto Bueno
    Matsumoto, Leopoldo Sussumu
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2021, 34 (02) : 328 - 338
  • [32] Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on stockpiled bermudagrass
    Griffin, Megan E.
    Muntifering, Russell B.
    Mullenix, Mary K.
    Held, David W.
    Dillard, Sandra L.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [33] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture
    Ruzzi, Maurizio
    Aroca, Ricardo
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2015, 196 : 124 - 134
  • [34] Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Agricultural Production
    de Andrade, Luana Alves
    Santos, Carlos Henrique Barbosa
    Frezarin, Edvan Teciano
    Sales, Luziane Ramos
    Rigobelo, Everlon Cid
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [35] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
    Bhattacharyya, P. N.
    Jha, D. K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (04): : 1327 - 1350
  • [36] Induced systemic resistance by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Pieterse, CMJ
    Van Pelt, JA
    Verhagen, BWM
    Ton, J
    Van Wees, SCM
    Léon-Kloosterziel, KM
    Van Loon, LC
    SYMBIOSIS, 2003, 35 (1-3) : 39 - 54
  • [37] Genetic and ecological inheritance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Khanghahi, Mohammad Yaghoubi
    Spagnuolo, Matteo
    Filannino, Pasquale
    Minervini, Fabio
    Crecchio, Carmine
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2024,
  • [38] Screening of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their growth-promoting activities for Stipa purpurea in alpine grassland
    Yi, Guoyun
    Li, Juan
    Wang, Xin
    Cheng, Liang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2025, 136 (03)
  • [39] Characterization of the Bioactive Metabolites from a Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Their Exploitation as Antimicrobial and Plant Growth-Promoting Agents
    George, Emrin
    Kumar, S. Nishanth
    Jacob, Jubi
    Bommasani, Bhaskara
    Lankalapalli, Ravi S.
    Morang, P.
    Kumar, B. S. Dileep
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 176 (02) : 529 - 546
  • [40] Stress mitigation strategies of plant growth-promoting rhizo-bacteria: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mechanisms
    Sharma, Vriti
    Singh, Aakriti
    Sharma, Diksha
    Sharma, Aashima
    Phogat, Sarika
    Chakraborty, Navjyoti
    Chatterjee, Sayan
    Purty, Ram Singh
    PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2021, 8 : 25 - 32