Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas

被引:118
|
作者
Shen, Xuemei [1 ]
Hu, Hongbo [1 ]
Peng, Huasong [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Xuehong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Life Sci & Biotechnol, State Key Lab Microbial Metab, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2013年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; Pseudomonad; Comparative genomics; Environmental adaptability; Rhizosphere colonization; Biocontrol activity; BETA-KETOADIPATE PATHWAY; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; OXIDATIVE STRESS; EFFLUX SYSTEM; GENE-CLUSTER; MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION; PYRROLOQUINOLINE-QUINONE; FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS; NITROGEN-FIXATION; CHLORORAPHIS GP72;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-14-271
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Some Pseudomonas strains function as predominant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Within this group, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas fluorescens are non-pathogenic biocontrol agents, and some Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are PGPR. P. chlororaphis GP72 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with a fully sequenced genome. We conducted a genomic analysis comparing GP72 with three other pseudomonad PGPR: P. fluorescens Pf-5, P. aeruginosa M18, and the nitrogen-fixing strain P. stutzeri A1501. Our aim was to identify the similarities and differences among these strains using a comparative genomic approach to clarify the mechanisms of plant growth-promoting activity. Results: The genome sizes of GP72, Pf-5, M18, and A1501 ranged from 4.6 to 7.1 M, and the number of protein-coding genes varied among the four species. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) analysis assigned functions to predicted proteins. The COGs distributions were similar among the four species. However, the percentage of genes encoding transposases and their inactivated derivatives (COG L) was 1.33% of the total genes with COGs classifications in A1501, 0.21% in GP72, 0.02% in Pf-5, and 0.11% in M18. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that GP72 and Pf-5 were the most closely related strains, consistent with the genome alignment results. Comparisons of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) between GP72 and Pf-5 revealed 3544 conserved genes. There were fewer conserved genes when GP72 CDSs were compared with those of A1501 and M18. Comparisons among the four Pseudomonas species revealed 603 conserved genes in GP72, illustrating common plant growth-promoting traits shared among these PGPR. Conserved genes were related to catabolism, transport of plant-derived compounds, stress resistance, and rhizosphere colonization. Some strain-specific CDSs were related to different kinds of biocontrol activities or plant growth promotion. The GP72 genome contained the cus operon (related to heavy metal resistance) and a gene cluster involved in type IV pilus biosynthesis, which confers adhesion ability. Conclusions: Comparative genomic analysis of four representative PGPR revealed some conserved regions, indicating common characteristics (metabolism of plant-derived compounds, heavy metal resistance, and rhizosphere colonization) among these pseudomonad PGPR. Genomic regions specific to each strain provide clues to its lifestyle, ecological adaptation, and physiological role in the rhizosphere.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
    Xuemei Shen
    Hongbo Hu
    Huasong Peng
    Wei Wang
    Xuehong Zhang
    BMC Genomics, 14
  • [2] Comparative genomic analysis and phenazine production of Pseudomonas chlororaphis, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium
    Chen, Yawen
    Shen, Xuemei
    Peng, Huasong
    Hu, Hongbo
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Xuehong
    GENOMICS DATA, 2015, 4 : 33 - 42
  • [3] Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    L. C. van Loon
    European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2007, 119 : 243 - 254
  • [4] Plant Growth-Promoting Actions of Rhizobacteria
    Spaepen, Stijn
    Vanderleyden, Jos
    Okon, Yaacov
    PLANT INNATE IMMUNITY, 2009, 51 : 283 - 320
  • [5] Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    van Loon, L. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2007, 119 (03) : 243 - 254
  • [6] Genotyping of antifungal compounds producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens
    Kumar, NR
    Arasu, VT
    Gunasekaran, P
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (12): : 1463 - 1466
  • [7] Mineral nutrition of plants inoculated with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria of Pseudomonas genus
    V. P. Shabayev
    Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2012, 2 (6) : 487 - 499
  • [8] Nutritional content analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria species
    Gunes, Adem
    Turan, Metin
    Gulluce, Medine
    Sahin, Fikrettin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2014, 60 : 88 - 97
  • [9] IRON REGULATION OF PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA
    KLOEPPER, JW
    SCHROTH, MN
    LEONG, J
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (02) : 231 - 232
  • [10] Current Perspectives on Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
    Javid A. Parray
    Sumira Jan
    Azra N. Kamili
    Raies A. Qadri
    Dilfuza Egamberdieva
    Parvaiz Ahmad
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2016, 35 : 877 - 902