Comparison of perioperative outcomes in elderly (age ≥ 75 years) vs. younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:28
|
作者
Yamada, Yuta [1 ]
Teshima, Taro [1 ]
Fujimura, Tetsuya [2 ]
Sato, Yusuke [1 ]
Nakamura, Masaki [1 ]
Niimi, Aya [1 ,3 ]
Kimura, Naoki [1 ]
Kakutani, Shigenori [1 ,4 ]
Kawai, Taketo [1 ]
Yamada, Daisuke [1 ]
Suzuki, Motofumi [1 ]
Kume, Haruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Mitsui Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; OLDER; RADIOTHERAPY; CONTINENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0234113
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men of age >= 75 years in comparison with younger men. Methods From November 2011 to December 2018, six hundred and thirty patients with prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A total of 614 patients were analyzed after excluding 16 patients who were treated with hormone therapy prior to RARP. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their age (age >= 75 years: N = 46 patients and age < 75 years: N = 568 patients). Perioperative parameters regarding oncologic/functional outcomes and complication status were compared between the 2 groups. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify perioperative complications. Clinical and pathological status including stage, positive margin, continence, and potency status after RARP were analyzed. Results Five-hundred sixty-eight and forty-six men were of age <75 and >= 75 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of oncologic outcomes (positive resection margin rate and PSA failure). The duration of hospitalization was longer in older patients but was not statistically significant (P = 0.051). A total number of Clavien >= 3 complications that occurred within a month after RARP were 15 (2.6%) and 2 (4.3%) in younger men (age < 75 years) and older men (age >= 75 years), respectively (P = 0.359). Conclusion The present study showed that the oncologic and surgical outcomes in the elderly group were similar to those in the younger population. However, the duration of hospitalization seemed to be longer in older patients (age >= 75 years), despite similar complication rates.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer
    Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix
    Georgi Tosev
    Ivan Damgov
    Philipp Reimold
    Cem Aksoy
    Gencay Hatiboglu
    Dogu Teber
    Josef Mansour
    Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas
    Jan Philipp Radtke
    Markus Hohenfellner
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 351 - 360
  • [42] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [43] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Yu-Li Jiang
    Gao-Feng Zheng
    Ze-Peng Jiang
    Xie-Lai Zhen-Li
    Jin Zhou
    Chun-Hua Zhou
    Kang-Er Ye
    BMC Urology, 20
  • [44] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES, FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES, AND COMPLICATIONS FOR ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY WITH ORTHOTOPIC NEOBLADDER IN ELDERLY VS. YOUNG PATIENTS
    Chenam, Avinash
    Chu, William
    Ruel, Nora
    Kilday, Patrick
    Jamnagerwalla, Juzar
    Lau, Clayton
    Zhumkhawala, Ali
    Chan, Kevin
    Yamzon, Jonathan
    Yuh, Bertram
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E620 - E620
  • [45] Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Liu, Guangxiang
    Ji, Changwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (02):
  • [46] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a novel robot-assisted modular platform: Perioperative outcomes from the largest multicentric series
    Prata, F.
    Totaro, A.
    Montanaro, F.
    Sighinolfi, C.
    Mottaran, A.
    Civitella, A.
    Bientinesi, R.
    Gandi, C.
    Iannuzzi, A.
    Marino, F.
    Veccia, A.
    Piazza, P.
    Ragusa, A.
    Russo, P.
    Scarciglia, E.
    Tedesco, F.
    Schiavina, R.
    Rocco, B.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Antonelli, A.
    Sacco, E.
    Bassi, P.
    Scarpa, R. M.
    Papalia, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S2014 - S2015
  • [47] Perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of Da Vinci vs. Hugo RAS for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: evidence based on controlled studies
    Wang, Li
    Yang, Jian-wei
    Li, Xiaoran
    Li, Kun-peng
    Wan, Shun
    Chen, Si-yu
    Yang, Li
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [48] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Men Aged ≥ 70 Years Editorial Comment
    Griebling, Tomas L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (02): : 559 - 560
  • [49] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Gupta, Narmada P.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Nayyar, Rishi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) : 1501 - 1505
  • [50] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Kao, W.
    Chung, C. -H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 177 - 177