The impact of non-compliance on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals: A review of the literature

被引:121
|
作者
Hughes, DA [1 ]
Bagust, A [1 ]
Haycox, A [1 ]
Walley, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Prescribing Res Grp, Liverpool L69 3GE, Merseyside, England
关键词
adherence; compliance; cost-effectiveness; pharmacotherapies;
D O I
10.1002/hec.609
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Non-compliance with drug therapies not only limits their effectiveness, but in some instances, is associated with grave clinical sequelae and substantial economic burden. It is important, therefore, to consider non-compliance in economic evaluations. A review of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, which have applied sensitivity analysis to non-compliance rates, was undertaken to evaluate the impact of non-compliance on the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies. Although 22 evaluations satisfied the inclusion criteria, additional information was obtained from the authors of most studies, as the published details were inadequate. The majority of evaluations assumed altered effectiveness owing to reduced compliance in the absence of supportive clinical evidence. Because of the disparity in the nature of the outcomes, the measures of non-compliance and the time horizon of the studies evaluated, it was not possible to compare the magnitude of the impact of non-compliance among different drug-disease combinations. However, it was evident that non-compliance always results in a reduction in efficacy, but its impact on costs varied substantially. The importance of incorporating measures of compliance is highlighted, as failing to account for 'real world' compliance rates in pharmacoeconomic evaluations may lead to selection of sub-optimal treatment strategies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 615
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HEART FAILURE TREATMENTSA TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW
    Cai, R.
    Mishra, N.
    Barion, F.
    Shah, D.
    Wang, X.
    Danielson, V
    Murphy, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S67 - S68
  • [42] A LITERATURE REVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN ELEMENTS IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES
    Udeze, C. J.
    Goto, D.
    Park, Y.
    Yang, K. F.
    Downton, K.
    Lecomte, P.
    Olson, M. S.
    Mullins, C. D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A284 - A285
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness of targeted oncology therapies: A systematic literature review
    Kalpas, E.
    Doyle, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A325 - A326
  • [44] Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in US Spine Literature
    Chang, Diana
    Zygourakis, Corinna C.
    Wadhwa, Harsh
    Kahn, James
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 41 - 41
  • [45] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLD: THE RESULTS OF A NOVEL LITERATURE REVIEW METHOD
    Hinde, S.
    Spackman, E.
    Claxton, K.
    Sculpher, M. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A354 - A354
  • [46] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOFEEDBACK AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE TREATMENTS - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    SCHNEIDER, CJ
    BIOFEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATION, 1987, 12 (02): : 71 - 92
  • [47] Modeling age differences in cost-effectiveness analysis - A review of the literature
    Russell, LB
    Sisk, JE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (04) : 1158 - 1167
  • [48] Are Trained Medical Interpreters Worth the Cost? A Review of the Current Literature on Cost and Cost-Effectiveness
    Brandl, Eva J.
    Schreiter, Stefanie
    Schouler-Ocak, Meryam
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2020, 22 (01) : 175 - 181
  • [49] Are Trained Medical Interpreters Worth the Cost? A Review of the Current Literature on Cost and Cost-Effectiveness
    Eva J. Brandl
    Stefanie Schreiter
    Meryam Schouler-Ocak
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2020, 22 : 175 - 181
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness models of non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review
    Willis, Michael
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Lwin, Zin Min Thet
    Bradvik, Gunnar
    Prelaj, Arsela
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2025, 31 (01): : 69 - 81