The Relationship between Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania and Local Perceptions of Risk and Opportunity

被引:107
|
作者
Schafft, Kai A. [1 ]
Borlu, Yetkin [2 ]
Glenna, Leland [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Educ Policy Studies, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ Sociol & Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
WESTERN ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; NATURAL-GAS; COMMUNITY SATISFACTION; SOCIAL INTEGRATION; BOOMTOWN; DISRUPTION; RECOVERY; METHANE; GROWTH; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1111/ruso.12004
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Recent advances in gas and oil drilling technology have led to dramatic boomtown development in many rural areas that have endured extended periods of economic decline. In Pennsylvania's Marcellus gas fields, the recent development of unconventional shale gas resources has not been without controversy. It has been variously framed as a major opportunity for economic revitalization at the local and regional levels and energy independence at the national level, but also as a significant environmental risk, with uncertain and uneven economic benefits. We use data from a survey conducted in 309 school districts located within Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale region to study the ways local stakeholders perceive both risk and opportunity associated with gas extraction from Marcellus Shale. Our analyses indicate that there is a strong positive association between perceptions of risk and opportunity associated with gas extraction. Further, the intensity of perception of both risk and opportunity is directly associated with the amount of local drilling, suggesting the complexity of local contexts within which local stakeholders evaluate rapid boomtown-associated community change. In total, these findings complicate the framing of unconventional gas extraction in the Marcellus Shale region, and indeed boomtown growth overall, as fundamentally polarizing issues.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 166
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Employment and Compensation in the Marcellus Shale Gas Boom: What Stays Local?
    Suchyta, Mark
    Kelsey, Timothy W.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 13 (04): : 87 - 106
  • [32] Public risk perceptions of shale gas development: A comprehensive review*
    Tan, Huimin
    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
    Zhang, Shumin
    Xu, Jianhua
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 89
  • [33] Assessment of policies to reduce core forest fragmentation from Marcellus shale development in Pennsylvania
    Abrahams, Leslie S.
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 153 - 160
  • [34] An Assessment of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated With the Use of Water, Sand, and Chemicals in Shale Gas Production of the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
    Sibrizzi, Christopher
    LaPuma, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 79 (04) : 8 - 15
  • [35] BEYOND SCIENCE AND HYSTERIA: REALITY AND PERCEPTIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE CONCERNS SURROUNDING MARCELLUS AND UTICA SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT
    Eisenberg, Ann M.
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2015, 77 (02) : 183 - 234
  • [36] Evaluating changes in groundwater and stream-water chemistry during natural-gas development of Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale
    Sohng, Jaeeun
    Barth-Naftilan, Erica
    Saiers, James
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [37] Acadian detachment and wrench faults in central Pennsylvania: Implications for the Marcellus Shale reservoir integrity and gas productivity in the hinge of the Pennsylvania salient
    Gao, Dengliang
    Roberts, Emily
    Geiger, Connor
    Sullivan, Peter
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2020, 8 (01): : T151 - T165
  • [39] Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development
    Lutz, Brian D.
    Lewis, Aurana N.
    Doyle, Martin W.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (02) : 647 - 656
  • [40] Environmental flows in the context of unconventional natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale
    Buchanan, Brian P.
    Auerbach, Daniel A.
    McManamay, Ryan A.
    Taylor, Jason M.
    Flecker, Alexander S.
    Archibald, Josephine A.
    Fuka, Daniel R.
    Walter, M. Todd
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (01) : 37 - 55