Influence of Mesh Sensitivities on Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Derivative Calculation

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Xu, Lincheng [1 ]
Li, Chunna [2 ]
Ye, Zheng-Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Dept Fluid Dynam, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Dept Aerosp Syst Engn, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
关键词
AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION; ADJOINT METHOD;
D O I
10.2514/1.J054881
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
To clarify the influence of mesh sensitivities on the computational-fluid-dynamics-based derivatives, a theoretical deduction and treatment of the mesh sensitivities are carried out, yielding an explicit mathematical formulation for issues of concern. Numerical tests focusing on aerodynamic shape derivatives, within the context of a transonic viscous flow passing through an RAE2822 airfoil, are conducted to validate the theoretical analysis. The automatic differentiation (the adjoint and tangent modes), as well as the finite difference, are applied to resolve the gradient information. Various mesh-deformation strategies, including the finite element analog, the spring analog, the original radial basis function interpolation, and a new modified radial basis function method, are applied to provide different mesh-sensitivity solutions. The numerical results confirm that mesh sensitivities are essential for the geometry-related numerical derivatives, and the reliance is independent of the perturbation magnitude and the gradient prediction algorithms. Furthermore, several basic necessary conditions for a reliable mesh-sensitivity solution conducted by mesh-deformation strategies are derived from numerical experiments. Among the different mesh-deformation strategies, the new modified radial basis functions and the finite element analog outperform the other ones in derivative calculation of the given RAE2822 case.
引用
收藏
页码:3717 / 3726
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of Control Surface with Freeplay Using Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Reduced-Order Models
    Morino, Hiroyuki
    Obayashi, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (02): : 569 - 583
  • [22] Certifiable computational fluid dynamics through mesh optimization
    Habashi, WG
    Dompierre, J
    Bourgault, Y
    Fortin, M
    Vallet, MG
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (05) : 703 - 711
  • [23] Toward Real-Time Computational-Fluid-Dynamics-Based Aeroelastic Computations Using a Database of Reduced-Order Information
    Amsallem, David
    Cortial, Julien
    Farhat, Charbel
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (09) : 2029 - 2037
  • [24] Numerical calculation on hydrodynamic characteristics for the amphibious vehicle based on computational fluid dynamics
    Gao, Fudong
    Jiang, Lehua
    Pan, Cunyun
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45 (05): : 134 - 139
  • [25] Review of Output-Based Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.
    Darmofal, David L.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2011, 49 (04) : 673 - 694
  • [26] Anisotropic mesh adaption: Application to computational fluid dynamics.
    Perotto, S
    BOLLETTINO DELLA UNIONE MATEMATICA ITALIANA, 2005, 8B (01): : 145 - 165
  • [27] Efficient computational fluid dynamics mesh generation by image registration
    Barber, D. C.
    Oubel, E.
    Frangi, A. F.
    Hose, D. R.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2007, 11 (06) : 648 - 662
  • [28] A decade of progress on anisotropic mesh adaptation for computational fluid dynamics
    Alauzet, Frederic
    Loseille, Adrien
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2016, 72 : 13 - 39
  • [29] Influence of Surface Roughness on the Pump Performance Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics
    He, Xiaoke
    Jiao, Weixuan
    Wang, Chuan
    Cao, Weidong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 (105331-105341) : 105331 - 105341
  • [30] Analysis of effective pore pressure in asphalt pavement based on computational fluid dynamics calculation
    Guo, Xuedong
    Sun, Mingzhi
    Dai, Wenting
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (02):