A comparison of functional control strategies for underwater vehicles: Theories, simulations and experiments

被引:18
|
作者
Xu, Zhizun [1 ]
Haroutunian, Maryam [1 ]
Murphy, Alan J. [1 ]
Neasham, Jeff [1 ]
Norman, Rose [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
AUV; ROV; Control theories; SMC; FLC; TRACKING; AUVS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107822
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Functional control is key for any autonomous robot, linking high-level artificial intelligence with the robot actuators. Due to environmental disturbances, model uncertainties and nonlinear dynamic systems, reliable functional control is essential and improvements in the controller design can significantly benefit the overall vehicle performance. Even though there are many published studies considering the design of various advanced controllers, most of them are not evaluated in physical experiments. In this research, four different control strategies have been investigated: Proportional-Integral-Derivative Control (PID), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), Backstepping Control (BC) and Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC). The performances of these four controllers were simulated initially and evaluated by practical experiments in different conditions, including various environmental disturbances and hydrodynamic coefficients. The main contributions are as follows: Firstly, this paper reports a comparison study between different types of controllers based on simulations and physical experiments in various conditions; Secondly, this paper provides an improved SMC algorithm combining the merits from linear control and nonlinear control, and a customized second-order FLC method.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experiments - Simulations - Theories: Multiscale approaches for solutions
    Dufreche, J. -E
    Malikova, N.
    Jardat, M.
    Meriguet, G.
    Dubois, E.
    Rotenberg, B.
    Marry, V.
    Molina, J.
    Turq, P.
    NEUTRONS ET SIMULATIONS, JDN 18, 2010, : 263 - 283
  • [22] A Comparison of Different Types of Motors Used For Low Speed Electric Vehicles: Experiments and Simulations
    Wang Yue
    Gao Dawei
    2014 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC) ASIA-PACIFIC 2014, 2014,
  • [23] Comparison of Centralized, Dispersed and Hybrid Multiagent Control Systems of Underwater Vehicles Team
    Szymak Piotr
    MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS, MECHANICS AND MATERIALS, 2012, 180 : 114 - 121
  • [24] Experiments on sampling/patrolling with two Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
    Marino, Alessandro
    Antonelli, Gianluca
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2015, 67 : 61 - 71
  • [25] MODELING AND CONTROL OF UNDERWATER ROBOTIC VEHICLES
    YUH, J
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1990, 20 (06): : 1475 - 1483
  • [26] Optimal and adaptive control of underwater vehicles
    Sagatun, SI
    Johansson, R
    ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 1996, 10 (03) : 283 - 299
  • [27] LEARNING CONTROL FOR UNDERWATER ROBOTIC VEHICLES
    YUH, J
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 1994, 14 (02): : 39 - 46
  • [28] Fault Tolerant Control in Underwater Vehicles
    Liu, Chang
    Filaretov, Vladimir
    Zuev, Alexander
    Protsenko, Alexander
    Zhirabok, Alexey
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [29] ROBUST TRAJECTORY CONTROL OF UNDERWATER VEHICLES
    YOERGER, DR
    SLOTINE, JJE
    IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 1985, 10 (04) : 462 - 470
  • [30] Optimal and adaptive control of underwater vehicles
    Total Transportation Systems , AS, Bergen, Norway
    Adv Rob, 3 (283-299):