Comparison of 3D FLAIR, 2D FLAIR, and 2D T2-Weighted MR Imaging of Brain Stem Anatomy

被引:30
|
作者
Kitajima, M. [1 ]
Hirai, T. [1 ]
Shigematsu, Y. [1 ]
Uetani, H. [1 ]
Iwashita, K. [1 ]
Morita, K. [2 ]
Komi, M. [2 ]
Yamashita, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
FLUID;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A2874
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although 3D FLAIR imaging visualizes detailed structures of the brain stem, it has not been used to evaluate its normal anatomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 3D FLAIR images can provide more detailed anatomic information of the brain stem than 2D FLAIR and 2D T2WI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated MR images in 10 healthy volunteers. 3D and 2D FLAIR images, 2D T2WI, and DTI were obtained on a 3T MR imaging scanner. A VISTA technique was used for 3D FLAIR imaging. White matter tracts and nuclei of the brain stem were determined on 3D and 2D FLAIR images and 2D T2WI by referring to anatomic atlases and DTI color maps. The subjective assessment of the visibility by using a 4-point grading system and the contrast ratio of the structures on 3D and 2D FLAIR images and 2D T2WI were evaluated. RESULTS: The visibility of the SCP and MCP, DSCP, CST, and CTT was higher on 3D FLAIR images than on 2D T2WI and 2D FLAIR images. The contrast ratio for the CST, SCP, MCP, DSCP, and CTT was significantly different on 3D FLAIR images and 2D T2WI and on 3D FLAIR and 2D FLAIR images; there was no significant difference in contrast ratio for the SCP at the pons on 3D FLAIR and 2D T2WI. CONCLUSIONS: 3D FLAIR images provide detailed anatomic information of the brain stem that cannot be obtained on 2D T2WI and 2D FLAIR images.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 927
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of T2-Weighted 3D-Space and T2-Weighted 2D-TSE Sequences in Lumbar Spine MR Imaging
    Qurat-ul-Ain
    Nadeem, Syed Farrukh
    Mirza, Tariq Mahmood
    Shafiq, Mazhar
    Batool, Zahida
    Khadijah-tul-Kubra
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2023, 29 (04): : 361 - 366
  • [22] Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: Preliminary results
    Bazot, M.
    Stivalet, A.
    Darai, E.
    Coudray, C.
    Thomassin-Naggara, I.
    Poncelet, E.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [23] Clinical Value of 3D T2*-weighted Imaging with Multi-echo Acquisition: Comparison with Conventional 2D T2*-weighted Imaging and 3D Phase-sensitive MR Imaging
    Kunimatsu, Akira
    Suzuki, Yuichi
    Hagiwara, Kazuchika
    Sasaki, Hiroki
    Mori, Harushi
    Katsura, Masaki
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 11 (03) : 205 - 211
  • [24] COMPARISON OF FLAIR PULSE SEQUENCES WITH HEAVILY T2-WEIGHTED SE SEQUENCES IN MR-IMAGING OF THE BRAIN
    BYDDER, GM
    HAJNAL, JV
    YOUNG, IR
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 151 - 151
  • [25] Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences
    T. Meindl
    S. Wirth
    S. Weckbach
    O. Dietrich
    M. Reiser
    S. O. Schoenberg
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 713 - 721
  • [26] Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences
    Meindl, T.
    Wirth, S.
    Weckbach, S.
    Dietrich, O.
    Reiser, M.
    Schoenberg, S. O.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 713 - 721
  • [27] Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques
    M.-J. Kim
    D. G. Mitchell
    K. Ito
    P. N. Kim
    Abdominal Imaging, 2001, 26 : 269 - 276
  • [28] Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques
    Kim, MJ
    Mitchell, DG
    Ito, K
    Kim, PN
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2001, 26 (03): : 269 - 276
  • [29] Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T
    Shinji Naganawa
    Tokiko Koshikawa
    Tatsuya Nakamura
    Hisashi Kawai
    Hiroshi Fukatsu
    Takeo Ishigaki
    Tomomi Komada
    Katsuya Maruyama
    Osamu Takizawa
    European Radiology, 2004, 14 : 1901 - 1908
  • [30] Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T
    Naganawa, S
    Koshikawa, T
    Nakamura, T
    Kawai, H
    Fukatsu, H
    Ishigaki, T
    Komada, T
    Maruyama, K
    Takizawa, O
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (10) : 1901 - 1908