Patients' preferences for information in health care decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Borracci, Raul A. [1 ]
Manente, Diego [2 ]
Giorgi, Mariano A. [2 ,3 ]
Calderon, Gustavo [4 ]
Ciancio, Alejandro [5 ]
Doval, Hernan C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Austral, Fac Ciencias Biomed, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Soc Argentina Cardiol, Area Invest, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Soc Argentina Cardiol, Com Bioet, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Sanatorio Franchin, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Corp Med Gral San Martin, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
patient; information; decision-making; disease; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; CANCER; COMMUNICATION; REQUIREMENTS; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients' preferences for information in health care decision-making. A survey was carried out among patients who concurred to cardiologic services to know how patients preferred to be informed about their health status, and the demographic characteristics associated to these preferences, considering the following items: knowledge about the disease, information about different therapeutic options and decision-making. From 770 people surveyed, 738 (95.8%) answered the form completely. A trend to trust only in the doctor's knowledge to obtain information (81.7%), in wanting to know the options of treatment and express one's point of view (85.9%), and to involve the family in the decisions (63.2%) was observed. 9.6% preferred to receive the minimum necessary information or "to know nothing" about an alleged serious disease. Males tended less to request options and give opinion on the subject (OR: 0.64), giving less freedom to family involvement (OR: 1.31). People with a lower social and economical level claim fewer options (OR: 0.48) and gave less family participation (OR = 1.79). Natives from other South American countries had a minor tendency to demand for options and express their thoughts (OR: 0.60); and the ones with lower education level trusted less in the doctor's knowledge (OR: 1.81), demanded fewer options (OR: 0.45) and chose not to know the severity of the disease (OR: 0.56). The analysis of the demographical variables allowed to define preferences associated to age, sex, origin, education, religion and health status. In conclusion, although it is imperative to promote the patient's autonomy, individual preferences must be taken into account before informing and compromising the patient in decision-making about his disease.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 398
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FUZZY PREFERENCES IN DECISION-MAKING
    MONTERO, FJ
    TEJADA, J
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1987, 286 : 144 - 150
  • [32] Capacity for Preferences Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision-Making
    Wasserman, Jason Adam
    Navin, Mark Christopher
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 (03) : 31 - 39
  • [33] Parental decision-making preferences in the pediatric intensive care unit
    Madrigal, Vanessa N.
    Carroll, Karen W.
    Hexem, Kari R.
    Faerber, Jennifer A.
    Morrison, Wynne E.
    Feudtner, Chris
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (10) : 2876 - 2882
  • [34] Preferences for Health Information and Decision-Making Autonomy among Chinese Patients with T2DM in the mHealth Era
    Nie, Lisa
    Xie, Bo
    Yang, Yan
    Brown, Sharon A.
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [35] PATIENTS PREFERENCES VERSUS PHYSICIANS JUDGMENT: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING?
    Muehlbacher, A. C.
    Juhnke, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A306 - A306
  • [36] DECISION-MAKING SITUATIONS IN HEALTH-CARE
    MURDACH, AD
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 1995, 20 (03) : 187 - 191
  • [37] Children, families, and health care decision-making
    Blustein, J
    BIOETHICS, 2000, 14 (02) : 181 - 185
  • [38] Health care decision-making, CM and the law
    Brophy, Elizabeth
    ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 1 (01) : 40 - 43
  • [39] DECISION-MAKING IN WOMENS HEALTH-CARE
    HODNE, CJ
    REITER, RC
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 37 (01): : 162 - 179
  • [40] Economic evaluation and health care decision-making
    Rutten, F
    HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 36 (03) : 215 - 229