Impact of CyberShake on Risk Assessments for Distributed Infrastructure Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Yajie [1 ]
Goulet, Christine [2 ]
Hu, Zhenghui [1 ]
Eguchi, Ronald T. [1 ]
机构
[1] ImageCat, Long Beach, CA 90802 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Southern Calif Earthquake Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
GROUND-MOTION MODEL; HAZARD ANALYSIS; CALIFORNIA; UNCERTAINTY; PGV;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake platform was designed as the first probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) model using physics-based earthquake simulations. Provided that the simulations have been properly validated, they should, in theory, capture the source, path, and site effects of a specific region. For this work, we build on a recent comprehensive probabilistic seismic risk analysis (PSRA) study of the underground water pipeline network for the City of Los Angeles, where the system-level performance (measured by the expected number of pipeline repairs, repair cost, and repair time) was established as a function of exceedance probability based on a large set of earthquake simulations using empirical ground motion models (GMMs). By repeating this study using the events and ground motions from the CyberShake simulations, we are exploring the impact of this region-specific PSHA models on seismic risk assessments of distributed infrastructure. Our results show that using the same set of earthquake ruptures and pipe fragility models, CyberShake simulations result in significantly lower estimates of system-level risks than those computed from empirical GMMs at relatively long return periods. More specifically, at a 500-year return period, the expected number of pipeline repairs computed from CyberShake is about 26% lower than that from empirical GMMs. At a 2,500-year return period, the reduction reaches 41%. While a reduction was expected, more work is needed to fully understand the sources of these difference.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 879
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A smart monitoring infrastructure design for distributed renewable energy systems
    Kabalci, Ersan
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 90 : 336 - 346
  • [42] Drivers' risk assessments and their impact on seat belt use
    Calisir, F
    Lehto, MR
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 31 (1-2) : 495 - 498
  • [43] Ecological risk assessment as a framework for environmental impact assessments
    Claassen, M
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (10-11) : 151 - 154
  • [44] Integrated risk and impact assessments for complex contaminated sites
    MacDonell, M
    Habegger, L
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2000, : 13 - 20
  • [45] Critical reliability assessments of distributed field-monitoring information systems
    Hsieh, Yo-Ming
    Chen, Yen-How
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 26 : 21 - 31
  • [46] Social impact assessments (SIA) in larger infrastructure investments in Sweden; the view of experts and practitioners
    Stjernborg, Vanessa
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2023, 41 (06) : 463 - 475
  • [47] Thermoeconomic and impact assessments of trigeneration systems with various fuels
    Sorgulu, Fatih
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    FUEL, 2022, 317
  • [48] The Impact of Distributed Autonomous PV Installations on Critical Infrastructure in Crisis Situations
    Cernan, Martin
    Halaska, Jiri
    Muller, Zdenek
    Tlusty, Josef
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 97520 - 97530
  • [49] Impact of Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack on Advanced Metering Infrastructure
    Satin Asri
    Bernardi Pranggono
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2015, 83 : 2211 - 2223
  • [50] Call for global health-systems impact assessments
    Swanson, R. Chad
    Mosley, Henry
    Sanders, David
    Egilman, David
    De Maeseneer, Jan
    Chowdhury, Mushtaque
    Lanata, Claudio F.
    Dearden, Kirk
    Bryant, Malcolm
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9688): : 433 - 435