MRI - Mammography 2D/3D data fusion for breast pathology assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Behrenbruch, CP
Marias, K
Armitage, PA
Yam, M
Moore, N
English, RE
Brady, JM
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Med Vis Lab Robot, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
[2] UCL, Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Surg, London NW3 2QG, England
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Magnet Resonance Imaging Ctr, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[4] Churchill Hosp, Breast Care Unit, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Increasing use is being made of contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Gd-DTPA) for breast cancer assessment since it provides 3D functional information via pharmacokinetic interaction between contrast agent and tumour vascularity, and because it is applicable to women of all ages. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) is complimentary to conventional X-ray mammography since it is a relatively low-resolution functional counterpart of a comparatively high-resolution 2D structural representation. However, despite the additional information provided by MRI, mammography is still an extremely important diagnostic imaging modality, particularly for several common conditions such as ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) where it has been shown that there is a strong correlation between microcalcification clusters and malignancy [1]. Pathological indicators such as calcifications and fine spiculations are not visible in CE-MRI and therefore there is clinical and diagnostic value to fusing the high-resolution structural information available from mammography with the functional data acquired from MRI imaging. This paper presents a novel data fusion technique whereby medio-lateral (ML) and craniocaudal (CC) mammograms (2D data) are registered to 3D contrast-enhanced MRI volumes. We utilise a combination of pharmacokinetic, modelling, projection geometry, wavelet-based landmark detection and thin-plate spline non-rigid registration to transform the coordinates of regions of interest (ROIs) from the 2D mammograms to the spatial reference frame of the contrast-enhanced MRI volume.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 316
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hemimegalencephaly: 2D, 3D Ultrasound and MRI Correlation
    Romero, X. C.
    Molina, F. S.
    Pastor, E.
    Amaya, F.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2011, 29 (03) : 257 - 260
  • [32] 3D data captured with 2D camera
    不详
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 2015, 49 (11) : 30 - 31
  • [33] 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms
    Hopp, Torsten
    Baltzer, Pascal
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    Ruiter, Nicole V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2012, 7 (03) : 339 - 348
  • [34] 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms
    Torsten Hopp
    Pascal Baltzer
    Matthias Dietzel
    Werner A. Kaiser
    Nicole V. Ruiter
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2012, 7 : 339 - 348
  • [35] Region Based Fusion of 3D and 2D Visual Data for Cultural Heritage Objects
    Frohlich, Robert
    Kato, Zoltan
    Tremeau, Alain
    Tamas, Levente
    Shabo, Shadi
    Waksman, Yona
    2016 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2016, : 2404 - 2409
  • [36] Alignment of multimodality, 2D and 3D breast images
    Grevera, GJ
    Udupa, JK
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 1135 - 1143
  • [37] Mapping Microcalcifications Between 2D Mammograms and 3D MRI Using a Biomechanical Model of the Breast
    Rajagopal, Vijay
    Chung, Jae-Hoon
    Highnam, Ralph P.
    Warren, Ruth
    Nielsen, Poul M. F.
    Nash, Martyn P.
    COMPUTATIONAL BIOMECHANICS FOR MEDICINE, 2010, : 17 - +
  • [38] THE ROLE OF 3D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER: COMPARISON WITH 2D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, MUGA AND CARDIAC MRI
    Walker, J. R.
    Bhullar, N.
    Fallah-Rad, N.
    Lytwyn, M.
    Golian, M.
    Fang, T.
    Singal, P. K.
    Barac, I.
    Kirkpatrick, I. D.
    Jassal, D. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 26 : 126D - 126D
  • [39] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [40] 2D and 3D MRI features of classic bladder exstrophy
    Tekes, A.
    Ertan, G.
    Solaiyappan, M.
    Stec, A. A.
    Sponseller, P. D.
    Huisman, T. A.
    Gearhart, J. P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 69 (05) : E223 - E229