The precision of regression-type estimator for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Chien-Hua [1 ]
Wan, Shu-Mei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Appl Math, Chungli 32023, Taiwan
[2] Lunghwa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Finance, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
关键词
clinical trials; econometric models; pharmaceutical statistics; point processes; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1080/00949655.2011.572073
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The estimation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) has received increasing attention recently. It is expressed in terms of the ratio of the change in costs of a therapeutic intervention to the change in the effects of the intervention. Despite the intuitive interpretation of ICER as an additional cost per additional benefit unit, it is a challenge to estimate the distribution of a ratio of two stochastically dependent distributions. A vast literature regarding the statistical methods of ICER has developed in the past two decades, but none of these methods provide an unbiased estimator. Here, to obtain the unbiased estimator of the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), the zero intercept of the bivariate normal regression is assumed. In equal sample sizes, the Iman-Conover algorithm is applied to construct the desired variance-covariance matrix of two random bivariate samples, and the estimation then follows the same approach as CER to obtain the unbiased estimator of ICER. The bootstrapping method with the Iman-Conover algorithm is employed for unequal sample sizes. Simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate the proposed method. The regression-type estimator performs overwhelmingly better than the sample mean estimator in terms of mean squared error in all cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIO (ICER) THRESHOLDS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Augustynska, J.
    Skora, K.
    Leszczynska, A.
    Seweryn, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S159 - S159
  • [22] Chain regression-type estimator using multiple auxiliary information in successive sampling
    Singh, Housila P.
    Srivastava, Manoj Kumar
    Srivastava, Namita
    Tarray, Tanveer A.
    Singh, Virendra
    Dixit, Shivam
    HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 44 (05): : 1247 - 1256
  • [23] The results of a pharmacoeconomic study: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus net monetary benefit
    Messori, Andrea
    Trippoli, Sabrina
    HEART, 2017, 103 (21) : 1746 - 1746
  • [24] MULTIPLE DECISION CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING AN INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIO OF EXPENSIVE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES
    Kamae, I
    Yamabe, K.
    Sugimoto, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A586 - A586
  • [25] IMPROVED BOOTSTRAP POINT AND CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF THE INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIO (ICER)
    Skrepnek, G. H.
    Sahai, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A201 - A201
  • [26] A simulation study to compare methods for constructing confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
    Fan M.-Y.
    Zhou X.-H.
    Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2007, 7 (1-2) : 57 - 77
  • [27] Fieller's Interval and the Bootstrap-Fieller Interval for the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio
    Guoyong Jiang
    Jianrong Wu
    G. Rhys Williams
    Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2000, 1 (3-4) : 291 - 303
  • [28] Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio of Alteplase in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the French Setting
    Alain Pelc
    Jacques Dardenne
    Jean-Hughes Frelon
    Guy Hanania
    PharmacoEconomics, 1997, 11 : 595 - 605
  • [29] MODIFIED REGRESSION-TYPE ESTIMATOR IN TWO-PHASE SAMPLING USING ARBITRARY PROBABILITIES
    Kamal, Asifa
    Shahbaz, Muhammad Qaiser
    Hanif, Muhammad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2009, 25 (02): : 141 - 147
  • [30] Improving mean estimation in ranked set sampling using the Rao regression-type estimator
    Pelle, Elvira
    Perri, Pier Francesco
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2018, 32 (03) : 467 - 496