Breaking the rules? A corpus-based comparison of informal features in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing

被引:10
|
作者
Lee, Joseph J. [1 ]
Bychkovska, Tetyana [2 ]
Maxwell, James D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Dept Linguist, ELIP Acad & Global Commun Program, 383 Gordy Hall, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept English, MSN 3E4,4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Ohio Univ, Dept Linguist, 383 Gordy Hall, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
Formality; Academic writing; Argumentative essays; Corpus analysis; First-year writing; METADISCOURSE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2018.11.010
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study reports findings of a comparative corpus-based analysis of informality in L1 and L2 undergraduate student argumentative essays. Data consist of two corpora of student essays: 101 high-rated essays written by L1-English students and 254 high-rated essays written by ESL students in US universities. Based on a taxonomy of the 10 most common informal features cited in style manuals, we compared informal language use in L1-English and ESL undergraduate student essays. Results reveal that overall frequency of informal features is significantly greater in L2 student texts. Findings also indicate that both groups rely on similar informal elements, yet they differ in distinct ways. While ESL student writers tend to employ significantly more anaphoric pronoun it and second-person pronouns, they use most other types less frequently than L1 writers, and generally appear to observe prescriptive rules more strictly. In contrast, L1-English writers tend to adopt a more liberal attitude toward these rules, employing a broader range of informal types, particularly those that have become relatively legitimized in academic writing. The paper concludes with implications for ESL composition pedagogy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The reference to L1 and L2 in SFL: proposals based on the Aprescrilov learner corpus
    Buyse, Kris
    Pereda, Lydia Fernandez
    Verveckken, Katrien
    32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE SPANISH ASSOCIATION OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS (AESLA): LANGUAGE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 173 : 274 - 278
  • [22] Exploring the Relationship Among L1 writing, L2 writing, and L2 Linguistic Proficiency Depending on L2 Topic Difficulty
    Lee, Hee-Kyung
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2012, 21 (03): : 576 - 586
  • [23] The ICoN Corpus of Academic Written Italian (L1 and L2)
    Cominetti, Federica
    Tavosanis, Mirko
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION (LREC 2018), 2018, : 4077 - 4083
  • [24] Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English: Studies in corpus linguistics
    Nassaji, Hossein
    MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2008, 92 (02): : 332 - 333
  • [25] Analysis of verb argument constructions (VACs) in L2 learners across proficiency levels: A corpus-based study in L1 Indonesian
    Lestari, Febriana
    APPLIED CORPUS LINGUISTICS, 2024, 4 (03):
  • [26] Tense and Aspect in the Academic Writing of Arab L2 Learners of English: A Corpus-Based Approach
    Btoosh, Mousa A.
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2019, 5 (02): : 26 - 47
  • [27] Determining the L2 academic writing development stage: a corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations
    Ahmad, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Muhammad Asim
    Siddique, Ali Raza
    IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2025, 63 (01): : 413 - 431
  • [28] ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing
    Yoon, H
    Hirvela, A
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2004, 13 (04) : 257 - 283
  • [29] The moderating effects of L2 proficiency on the relationship between reading and writing in L2 and across L1 and L2
    Kim, Kyung Ja
    Pae, Tae-Il
    FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2023, 56 (01) : 75 - 101
  • [30] THE INFLUENCE OF SYLLABIFICATION RULES IN L1 ON L2 WORD RECOGNITION
    Choi, Wonil
    Nam, Kichun
    Lee, Yoonhyoung
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2015, 117 (02) : 535 - 553