Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: Systematic reviews of five methods

被引:129
|
作者
Simkin, PP [1 ]
O'Hara, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
labor; comfort; pain relief; nonpharmacologic; intradermal; intracutaneous; back pain; doula; support; positioning; ambulation; massage; hydrotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70188-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Nonpharmacologic measures to reduce labor pain have been used throughout history. Despite reports that some of these methods reduce pain, increase maternal satisfaction, and improve other obstetric outcomes, they have received limited attention in the medical literature and are not commonly available to women in North America. The controlled studies of nonpharmacologic methods are limited in number and sometimes provide conflicting results. This systematic review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the best studied techniques, as well as to highlight areas in need of further research, Five comfort measures were selected for review, based on these criteria: they have been evaluated with prospective controlled studies and they require institutional support (eg, skills, policies, equipment). These 5 methods included continuous labor support, baths, touch and massage, maternal movement and positioning, and intradermal water blocks for back pain relief. An extensive search of electronic databases and other sources identified studies for consideration. Critical evaluation of controlled studies of these 5 methods suggests that all 5 may be effective in reducing labor pain and improving other obstetric outcomes, and they are safe when used appropriately, Additional well-designed studies are warranted to further clarify their effect and to evaluate their cost effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:S131 / S159
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy: Cochrane database of systematic reviews
    Saluja, S.
    Ahmad, G.
    O'Flynn, H.
    Watson, A.
    Leach, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 189 - 189
  • [22] The efficacy and safety of paracetamol for pain relief: an overview of systematic reviews
    Shaheed, Christina Abdel
    Ferreira, Giovanni
    Dmitritchenko, Alissa
    McLachlan, Andrew
    Day, Richard O.
    Saragiotto, Bruno
    Lin, Christine
    Langendyk, Vicki
    Stanaway, Fiona
    Latimer, Jane
    Kamper, Steven
    McLachlan, Hanan
    Ahedi, Harbeer
    Maher, Christopher G.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 214 (07) : 324 - 331
  • [23] Coping with information overload in pain relief: the role of systematic reviews
    Jadad, AR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-LONDON, 1998, 2 (02): : 187 - 188
  • [24] Pain Relief by TENS during Labor Pain is still unclear
    不详
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR AKUPUNKTUR, 2009, 52 (03): : 63 - 63
  • [25] The nature and management of Labor pain: Part 1. Nonpharmacologic pain relief (vol 68, pg 1109, 2003)
    Leeman, L
    Fontaine, P
    King, V
    Klein, MC
    Ratcliffe, S
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2003, 68 (12) : 2330 - 2330
  • [26] PAIN AND PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR
    LENNANE, KJ
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 87 (603) : 1 - 3
  • [27] PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR
    MOIR, DD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1977, 17 (03): : 226 - &
  • [28] PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR
    LUMLEY, J
    WOOD, C
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1978, 1 (02) : 104 - 104
  • [29] PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR
    MAPLESTONE, PA
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1977, 2 (18) : 610 - 612
  • [30] PAIN RELIEF IN LABOR
    REYNOLDS, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (11): : 979 - 983