Cervical Disc Replacement: Trends, Costs, and Complications

被引:24
|
作者
Jain, Nickul Saral [1 ]
Nguyen, Ailene [1 ]
Formanek, Blake [1 ]
Alluri, Ram [1 ]
Buser, Zorica [1 ]
Hah, Ray [1 ]
Wang, Jeffrey Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1450 San Pablo St,HC4 5400A, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Cervical disc arthroplasty; Complications; Costs and cost analysis; Demography; 7-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; ADVERSE EVENTS; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; DISKECTOMY; ADJACENT; DISEASE; RADICULOPATHY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2019.0246
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective review of insurance database. Purpose: To investigate national trends, complications, and costs after cervical disc replacement (CDR) using an administrative insurance database representative of the United States population. Overview of Literature: As CDR continues to be used to treat patients with cervical stenosis, it is important to gain a better understanding of its use on a national level, potential complications, and cost. This information will allow for optimal patient counseling, risk stratification, and healthcare cost assessments. Several prior studies have investigated complications associated with CDR, but they have been limited by small sample size, single institution experiences, limited follow-up, and potential conflicts of interest. Methods: Patients who underwent single or multilevel CDR between 2007 and 2015 were identified using an insurance database. We collected data on annual trends, reimbursement costs, patient demographic information, hospital information, and information on complications from the time of operation to 1 year postoperative. Results: Total of 293 patients underwent either single or multilevel CDR. The number of procedures increased nonlinearly over time at an average of 17% per year, with a greater increase seen in the outpatient setting. Less than 3.7% of patients had new onset pain within 1 year after CDR. Within 1 year, 12.3% of patients reported a mechanical and/or bone-related complication. There were no patients who indicated a new nerve injury within 6 months of follow-up. Less than 3.7% of patients presented with dysphagia or dysphonia within 6 months, infection within 3 months, or a revision or reoperation within 1 year. Average reimbursement for single-level inpatient versus outpatient CDR was US $33,696.28 and US $34,675.12, respectively (p=0.29). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the use of CDR continued to increase. The most common complication was mechanical and/or bone-related, and cost analysis demonstrated no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient CDR.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 654
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical spine fracture through a cervical disc replacement
    Flanagan, M.
    Cawley, D. T.
    Cassidy, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2018, 47 : 80 - 88
  • [22] Cervical total disc replacement (TDR)
    Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
    Salah Khalifah
    Melanie Liem
    Johannes Holz
    Alf Giese
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 480 - 482
  • [23] Bryan total disc arthroplasty: a replacement disc for cervical disc disease
    Wenger, Markus
    Markwalder, Thomas-Marc
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2010, 3 : 11 - 24
  • [24] Comparison of the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Disc Disease
    Tabanli, Alper
    Akcay, Emrah
    Yilmaz, Hakan
    Ak, Cafer
    Bologur, Onur
    Kayikci, Engin
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2024, 34 (05): : 551 - 555
  • [25] Comparison of the safety of outpatient cervical disc replacement with inpatient cervical disc replacement A protocol for a meta-analysis
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Meng, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Hong, Ying
    Wang, Beiyu
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (35)
  • [26] Cervical artificial disc replacement - Part 2: Clinical experience with the cervical artificial disc
    Yi, Seong
    Ahn, Poong Gee
    Kim, Daniel H.
    Lee, Dong Yeob
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Shin, Hyun Chul
    Viswanathan, Ashwin
    Yoon, Do Heum
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 2008, 18 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [27] Bileaflet valve replacement: Complications and costs
    MigliaccioWalle, K
    Klittich, W
    Banks, J
    OBrien, JA
    Caro, JJ
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 1996, 13 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [28] Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Meng, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Hong, Ying
    Wang, Beiyu
    Ding, Chen
    Yang, Yi
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (07) : 1121 - 1133
  • [29] Cervical Disc Replacement vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Mantica, Abigail L.
    Meals, Clifton
    O'Brien, Joseph
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 25 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [30] Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy
    McGonagle, L.
    Cadman, S.
    Chitgopkar, S. D.
    Canavan, L.
    O'Matey, M.
    Shackieford, I. M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2011, 2 (02): : 82 - 85