Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

被引:11
|
作者
Comaish, IF [1 ]
Domniz, YY [1 ]
Lawless, MA [1 ]
Webber, SK [1 ]
Rogers, CM [1 ]
Sutton, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Eye, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01269-5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic regression and undercorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Setting. The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. Methods: Fifty eyes of 32 patients were treated by LASIK for residual myopia following primary PRK The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -2.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.57 (SD) (range -0.75 to -7.88 D). The mean refractive cylinder was 0.96 +/- 0.74 D (range 0 to 3.50 D). For analysis, the eyes were divided into 2 groups: those with 0 or low corneal haze (Group 1) and those with severe corneal haze (Group 2). In Group 1, the SEQ was -1.99 +/- 0.79 D (range -0.75 to -3.75 D) and in Group 2, -3.77 +/- 1.62 D (range -0.75 to -7.90 D). The procedure was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper(R) and the Summit Apex Plus(R) laser. The mean interval between PRK and LASIK was 25 months (range 9 to 59 months). The following parameters were studied before and after LASIK retreatment: SEQ, mean refractive cylinder, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Complications after LASIK retreatment were evaluated. Results: Six months after LASIK, the mean SEQ in all eyes was -0.65 +/- 0.86 D (range +/-1.50 to -3.35 D); 70.0% of eyes were within 1,00 D of emmetropia and the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 72.5%. The mean SEQ in Group 1 was -0.22 +/- 0.55 D (range -0.88 to -1.50 D) and in Group 2, -0.97 +/- 0.92 D (range 0.12 to -3.25 D); the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 94.0% of eyes in Group 1 and in 56.0% in Group 2. No statistically significant between-group difference was found in lines of Snellen acuity lost or gained at 6 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of BCVA. Conclusions: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for treating eyes with 0 or low haze with residual myopia after PRK It is less predictable in eyes with severe haze. (C) 2002 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 781
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A mathematical model for laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy
    Lieberman, DM
    Grierson, JW
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 16 (02) : 177 - 186
  • [42] Comparison of laser it situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters
    Wang, Z
    Chen, JQ
    Yang, B
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 13 (06): : 528 - 534
  • [43] Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia
    Shortt, Alex J.
    Allan, Bruce D. S.
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (01):
  • [44] Comparison of two procedures: Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia
    Lee, JB
    Kim, JS
    Choe, CM
    Seong, GJ
    Kim, EK
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 45 (05) : 487 - 491
  • [45] Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of-6.00 diopters or less
    Tole, DM
    McCarty, DJ
    Couper, T
    Taylor, HR
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 17 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [46] Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after radial keratotomy
    Gimbel, HV
    Sun, R
    Chin, PK
    vanWestenbrugge, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1997, 32 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [47] Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia
    Van Gelder, RN
    Steger-May, K
    Yang, SH
    Rattanatam, T
    Pepose, JS
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (03): : 462 - 476
  • [48] Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with Mitomycin C for high myopia
    Mather, Jessica Littman
    Holzman, Andrew
    Smeriglio, James
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [49] Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia - A randomized prospective study
    Hersh, PS
    Brint, SF
    Maloney, RK
    Durrie, DS
    Gordon, M
    Michelson, MA
    Thompson, VM
    Berkeley, RB
    Schein, OD
    Steinert, RF
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (08) : 1512 - 1522
  • [50] Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia
    AJ, Shortt
    BDS, Allan
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02):