Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation

被引:198
|
作者
Kramer, Steven L. [1 ]
Mitchell, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Shannon & Wilson Inc, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1193/1.2194970
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The requirements of performance-based earthquake engineering place increasing importance on the optimal characterization of earthquake ground motions. With respect to liquefaction hazard evaluation, ground motions have historically been characterized by a combination of peak acceleration and earthquake magnitude, and more recently by Arias intensity. This paper introduces a new ground motion intensity measure, CAV(5), and shows that excess pore pressure generation in potentially liquefiable soils is considerably more closely related to CAV(5) than to other intensity measures, including peak acceleration and Arias intensity. CAV(5) is shown to be an efficient, sufficient, and predictable intensity measure for rock motions used as input to liquefaction hazard evaluations. An attenuation relationship for CAV(5) is presented and used in an example that illustrates the benefits of scaling bedrock motions to a particular value of CAV(5), rather than to the historical intensity measures, for performance-based evaluation of liquefaction hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 438
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liquefaction Estimation and Hazard Evaluation Criteria of Sand Soil Foundation of Horizontal Ground
    Chi, Zecheng
    Dai, ZhangJun
    Chen, Shanxiong
    Li, Jian
    Song, Ruijun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL, TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 78 : 362 - 365
  • [22] Regression-based Evaluation of Novel Intensity Measures under Alternative Ground Motion Record Sets
    Kadas, K.
    Yakut, A.
    XII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, EURODYN 2023, 2024, 2647
  • [23] The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation
    Kramer, S. L.
    Sideras, S. S.
    Greenfield, M. W.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 91 : 133 - 146
  • [24] Ranking method of the severest input ground motion for underground structures based on composite ground motion intensity measures
    Chen, Zhiyi
    Yu, Wei
    Zhu, Hehua
    Xie, Lili
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 168
  • [25] Modification of stochastic ground motion models for matching target intensity measures
    Tsioulou, Alexandra
    Taflanidis, Alexandros A.
    Galasso, Carmine
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2018, 47 (01): : 3 - 24
  • [26] Ground motion and probabilistic hazard
    R. M. W. Musson
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 7 : 575 - 589
  • [27] Ground motion intensity measures for performance-based earthquake engineering
    Conte, JP
    Pandit, H
    Stewart, JP
    Wallace, JW
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1465 - 1472
  • [28] Prediction of Ground Motion Intensity Measures Using an Artificial Neural Network
    K. P. Sreejaya
    Jahnabi Basu
    S. T. G. Raghukanth
    D. Srinagesh
    Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2021, 178 : 2025 - 2058
  • [29] Comparison of real and simulated records using ground motion intensity measures
    Karimzadeh, Shaghayegh
    Kadas, Koray
    Askan, Aysegul
    Yakut, Ahmet
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 147
  • [30] Comparison of ground motion intensity measures using the incremental dynamic analysis
    Giovenale, P
    Ciampoli, M
    Jalayer, F
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1483 - 1491