A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways

被引:74
|
作者
Tricase, Caterina [1 ]
Lamonaca, Emilia [1 ]
Ingrao, Carlo [1 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [2 ]
Lo Giudice, Agata [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ, Largo Papa Giovanni Paolo 2,1, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci Prod Landscape & Agroener, Via Giovanni Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Johannesburg, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Qual & Operat Management, APB Campus,POB 524,Auckland Pk, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Cereals; Life cycle analysis; Comparative assessment; Organic farming; Conventional farming; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY; GRAIN PRODUCTION; CROP PRODUCTION; EMISSIONS; SYSTEMS; LCA; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper is based upon a comparative environmental evaluation between organic and conventional cultivation of barley, under favorable pedo-climatic conditions. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed alternatively using, as Functional Units (FUs), 1 ha of land involved in cultivation of barley to seek environmental sustainability and 1 kg of dry matter grains of produced barley to check productive efficiency. The study aims at highlighting the best solution for cultivation of barley. The topic was addressed because of the lack of comprehensive comparisons between organic and conventional management of barley production systems, which involve specific methodological assumptions (i.e. different FUs, economic allocation procedure between product and co-product). Findings from comparative LCA show that organic barley cultivation is the most environmentally sustainable solution (but not efficient in production), vice versa conventional barley cultivation is the solution most efficient in production (but not environmentally sustainable). Using 1 ha as FU, the cultivation of organic barley produces environmental impacts for 2.33 pt vs. the 2.55 pt of the cultivation of conventional barley. Vice-versa using 1 kg as FU, organic barley accounts for 3.103E-04 pt vs. the 2.396E-04 pt of conventional barley. Efficiency in production and environmental sustainability may also depend on qualitative elements (crop quality and adaptiveness to specific pedo-climatic conditions). (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3747 / 3759
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A sustainable alternative? A comparative life cycle assessment of epoxy adhesives
    Anastasiou, Dimitrios E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2023, 140 (48)
  • [22] A Comparative Study of Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Concrete Mixes
    Kumari, Sunita
    Walia, Rinku
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 9 (02): : 187 - 196
  • [23] Assessing the ecological soundness of organic and conventional agriculture by means of life cycle assessment (LCA) A case study of leek production
    de Backer, Eline
    Aertsens, Joris
    Vergucht, Sofie
    Steurbaut, Walter
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (10): : 1028 - 1061
  • [24] Comprehensive assessment of combined inorganic and organic fertilization strategies on cotton cultivation: implications for sustainable agriculture
    Lin, Shudong
    Wang, Quanjiu
    Wei, Kai
    Zhao, Xue
    Tao, Wanghai
    Sun, Yan
    Su, Lijun
    Deng, Mingjiang
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2024, 104 (14) : 8456 - 8468
  • [25] Comparative life cycle impact assessment of electric and conventional bus in Vietnam
    Le Quyen Luu
    Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Hoai-Nam Nguyen
    Thanh Mai Nguyen
    Hong Anh Nguyen
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 54
  • [26] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles in Lithuania
    Petrauskiene, Kamile
    Skvarnaviciute, Monika
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 246
  • [27] Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and new fused magnesia production
    Li, Jinhua
    Zhang, Yun
    Shao, Shuai
    Zhang, Shushen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 91 : 170 - 179
  • [28] Comparative life cycle impact assessment of electric and conventional bus in Vietnam
    Luu, Le Quyen
    Riva Sanseverino, Eleonora
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Nguyen, Hoai-Nam
    Nguyen, Thanh Mai
    Nguyen, Hong Anh
    Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 54
  • [29] Social life cycle assessment of Swedish organic and conventional pork production
    S. Zira
    E. Röös
    E. Ivarsson
    R. Hoffmann
    L. Rydhmer
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1957 - 1975
  • [30] Social life cycle assessment of Swedish organic and conventional pork production
    Zira, S.
    Roos, E.
    Ivarsson, E.
    Hoffmann, R.
    Rydhmer, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10): : 1957 - 1975