Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples

被引:8
|
作者
Johansson, Karin [1 ]
Karlsson, Hanna [1 ]
Noren, Torbjorn [2 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Mol Diagnost, Dept Lab Med, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Univ Orebro, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Lab Med Clin Microbiol, Orebro, Sweden
关键词
Clostridium difficile; diagnostics; glutamate dehydrogenase; toxin A/B EIA; GLUTAMATE-DEHYDROGENASE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; MICROBIOLOGY; CDI;
D O I
10.1111/apm.12595
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has, in recent years, seen the introduction of rapid dual-EIA (enzyme immunoassay) tests combining species-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) with toxin A/B. In a prospective study, we compared the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete test to a combination of selective culture (SC) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of the toxin A gene. Of 419 specimens, 68 were positive in SC including 62 positive in LAMP (14.7%). The combined EIA yielded 82 GDH positives of which 47 were confirmed toxin A/B positive (11%) corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 94% for GDH EIA compared to SC and for toxin A/B EIA a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 99% compared to LAMP. Twenty different PCR ribotypes were evenly distributed except for UK 081 where only 25% were toxin A/B positive compared to LAMP. We propose a primary use of a combined GDH toxin A/B EIA permitting a sensitive 1-h result of 379 of 419 (90%, all negatives plus GDH and toxin EIA positives) referred specimens. The remaining 10% being GDH positive should be tested for toxin A/B gene on the same day and positive results left to a final decision by the physician.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1020
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Colonization on the Risk of Subsequent C. difficile Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Sudekum, Madeleine L.
    Frei, Reno
    Widmer, Andreas F.
    Ellis, Brandon C.
    Bartlett, John
    Perl, Trish M.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (11): : 1324 - 1329
  • [32] Three-centre evaluation of laboratory Clostridium difficile detection algorithms and the EntericBio® realtime C. difficile assay
    Lucey, B.
    Blake, L.
    Watson, M.
    McIlhagga, A.
    Quinn, N.
    Corcoran, G. D.
    Ratnaraja, N.
    Swindells, J.
    ANAEROBE, 2018, 49 : 53 - 57
  • [33] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in pediatric stool samples: an evaluation of Quik Check Complete Antigen assay, BD GeneOhm Cdiff PCR, and ProGastro Cd PCR assays
    Selvaraju, Suresh B.
    Gripka, Megan
    Estes, Kristen
    Ashley Nguyen
    Jackson, Mary Anne
    Selvarangan, Rangaraj
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2011, 71 (03) : 224 - 229
  • [34] Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in stool using the VIDASR C-difficile Toxin A II assay
    Lipson, SM
    Tortora, G
    Tempone, A
    Fedorko, DP
    Spitzer, ED
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2003, 45 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [35] Evaluation of 3 automated real-time PCR (Xpert C. difficile assay, BD MAX Cdiff, and IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 assay) for detecting Clostridium difficile toxin gene compared to toxigenic culture in stool specimens
    Yoo, Jaeeun
    Lee, Hyeyoung
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Lee, Gun Dong
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2015, 83 (01) : 7 - 10
  • [36] Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
    Sambri, Vittorio
    Gateau, Cecile
    Zannoli, Silvia
    Dirani, Giorgio
    Couturier, Jeanne
    Op den Buijs, Ingrid
    Roymans, Rene
    Hallet, Emma
    Arnold, Mihaela
    Zumoberhaus, Anja
    Steiner, Stanislava
    van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen
    Altwegg, Martin
    Berlinger, Livia
    Barbut, Frederic
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 39 (06) : 1169 - 1175
  • [37] Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
    Vittorio Sambri
    Cécile Gateau
    Silvia Zannoli
    Giorgio Dirani
    Jeanne Couturier
    Ingrid Op den Buijs
    René Roymans
    Emma Hallet
    Mihaela Arnold
    Anja Zumoberhaus
    Stanislava Steiner
    Jeroen van de Bovenkamp
    Martin Altwegg
    Livia Berlinger
    Frédéric Barbut
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2020, 39 : 1169 - 1175
  • [38] Evaluation of the Fully Automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile Assays for Direct Detection of Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens
    Dalpke, Alexander H.
    Hofko, Marjeta
    Zorn, Markus
    Zimmermann, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (06) : 1906 - 1908
  • [39] Importance of Culture for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin from Stool Samples to Report True Incidence and Mortality Related to C. difficile in Hospitals
    Bayardelle, Paul
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (07) : 1134 - 1135
  • [40] Performance of the TechLab C DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C difficile tox A/B II EIA Kit, the triage C difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea
    Snell, H
    Ramos, M
    Longo, S
    John, M
    Hussain, Z
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (10) : 4863 - 4865