Large predators and their prey in a southern African savanna: a predator's size determines its prey size range

被引:245
|
作者
Radloff, FGT [1 ]
Du Toit, JT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Mammal Res Inst, Dept Zool & Entomol, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
allometry; coexistence; diet breadth; guild relations; large carnivores;
D O I
10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. A long-term (13-year) data set, based on > 4000 kills, was used to test whether a sympatric group of large predators adheres to the theoretical predictions that (1) mean prey body size and (2) prey diversity increase as functions of predator body size. 2. All kills observed by safari guides are documented routinely in Mala Mala Private Game Reserve, South Africa. We analysed these records for lion (Panthera leo, Linnaeus), leopard (Panthera pardus, Linnaeus), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus, Schreber) and African wild dog (Lycaon pictus, Temminck). Males and females of the sexually dimorphic felid species were treated as functionally distinct predator types. Prey types were classified by species, sex and age class. 3. Prey profiles were compared among predator types in terms of richness and evenness to consider how both the range of prey types used and the dominance of particular prey types within each range may be influenced by predator size. No significant size-dependent relationships were found, so factors separate from or additional to body size must explain variation in prey diversity across sympatric predators. 4. A statistically strong relationship was found between mean prey mass and predator mass (r(2) = 0.86, P= 0.002), although pairwise comparisons showed that most predators killed similar prey despite wide differences in predator size. Also, minimum prey mass was independent of predator mass while maximum prey mass was strongly dependent on predator mass (r(2) = 0.71, P= 0.017). The ecological significance is that larger predators do not specialize on larger prey, but exploit a wider range of prey sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 423
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predator-prey mass ratio revisited: does preference of relative prey body size depend on individual predator size?
    Tsai, Cheng-Han
    Hsieh, Chih-hao
    Nakazawa, Takefumi
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (12) : 1979 - 1987
  • [32] Optimal range of prey size for antlions
    Humeau, Antoine
    Rouge, Justine
    Casas, Jerome
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2015, 40 (06) : 776 - 781
  • [33] Temperature alters the predator-prey size relationships and size-selectivity of Southern Ocean fish
    Eskuche-Keith, Patrick
    Hill, Simeon L.
    Lopez-Lopez, Lucia
    Rosenbaum, Benjamin
    Saunders, Ryan A.
    Tarling, Geraint A.
    O'Gorman, Eoin J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [34] Predator group size distributions in predator-prey systems
    Wang, Xueting
    Pan, Qiuhui
    Kang, Yibin
    He, Mingfeng
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2016, 26 : 117 - 127
  • [35] Disentangling the effects of predator body size and prey density on prey consumption in a lizard
    Gonzalez-Suarez, Manuela
    Mugabo, Marianne
    Decenciere, Beatriz
    Perret, Samuel
    Claessen, David
    Le Galliard, Jean-Francois
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 158 - 165
  • [36] Predator-prey dynamics and the plasticity of predator body size
    DeLong, John P.
    Hanley, Torrance C.
    Vasseur, David A.
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) : 487 - 493
  • [37] Joint evolution of predator body size and prey-size preference
    Troost, Tineke A.
    Kooi, Bob W.
    Dieckmann, Ulf
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) : 771 - 799
  • [39] Joint evolution of predator body size and prey-size preference
    Tineke A. Troost
    Bob W. Kooi
    Ulf Dieckmann
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2008, 22 : 771 - 799
  • [40] Picky predators and odd prey: colour and size matter in predator choice and zebrafish's vulnerability - a refinement of the oddity effect
    Aivaz, Angela N.
    Manica, Andrea
    Neuhaus, Peter
    Ruckstuhl, Kathreen E.
    ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2020, 32 (02) : 135 - 147