Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions

被引:101
|
作者
Hendriks, R. J. [1 ]
van Oort, I. M. [1 ]
Schalken, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH INDEX PHI; ANTIGEN; 3; PCA3; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; FUSION TRANSCRIPTS; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; GENE FUSION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPROVE; MEN; SERUM;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.59
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on serum PSA testing and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and histopathologic evaluation of prostate biopsies. The main drawback of PSA testing is the lack of specificity for PCa. To improve early detection of PCa more specific biomarkers are needed. In the past few years, many new promising biomarkers have been identified; however, to date, only a few have reached clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we discuss new blood-based and urinary biomarker models that are promising for usage in PCa detection, follow-up and treatment decision-making. These include Prostate Health Index (PHI), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), four-kallikrein panel (4K), transmembrane protease serine 2-ERG (TMPRSS2-ERG), ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, SelectMDx and the Mi-Prostate score. Only few head-to-head studies are available for these new fluid-based biomarkers and/or models. The blood-based PHI and urinary PCA3 are two US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers for diagnosis of PCa. In the second part of this review, we give an overview of published studies comparing these two available biomarkers for prediction of (1) PCa upon prostate biopsy, (2) pathological features in radical prostatectomy specimen and (3) significant PCa in patients eligible for active surveillance. RESULTS: Studies show opposing results in comparison of PHI with PCA3 for prediction of PCa upon initial and repeat prostate biopsy. PHI and PCA3 are able to predict pathological findings on radical prostatectomy specimen, such as tumor volume and Gleason score. Only PHI could predict seminal vesicle invasion and only PCA3 could predict multifocality. There is some evidence that PHI outperforms PCA3 in predicting significant PCa in an active surveillance population. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on independent validation of promising fluid-based biomarkers/models, and prospective comparison of biomarkers with each other.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Circulating nucleosomes as new blood-based biomarkers for detection of colorectal cancer
    Rahier, Jean-Francois
    Druez, Anne
    Faugeras, Laurence
    Martinet, Jean-Paul
    Gehenot, Myriam
    Josseaux, Eleonore
    Herzog, Marielle
    Micallef, Jake
    George, Fabienne
    Delos, Monique
    De Ronde, Thierry
    Badaoui, Abdenor
    D'Hondt, Lionel
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2017, 9
  • [22] Circulating nucleosomes as new blood-based biomarkers for detection of colorectal cancer
    Jean-François Rahier
    Anne Druez
    Laurence Faugeras
    Jean-Paul Martinet
    Myriam Géhénot
    Eléonore Josseaux
    Marielle Herzog
    Jake Micallef
    Fabienne George
    Monique Delos
    Thierry De Ronde
    Abdenor Badaoui
    Lionel D’Hondt
    Clinical Epigenetics, 2017, 9
  • [23] Blood-based protein biomarkers in breast cancer
    Nunez, Cristina
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 490 : 113 - 127
  • [24] Novel urinary biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer: A systematic review
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Tan, Wei Phin
    Tan, Mae-Yen
    Khetrapal, Pramit
    Dong, Liqin
    deWinter, Patricia
    Feber, Andrew
    Kelly, John D.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 69 : 39 - 52
  • [25] Novel biomarkers for the detection of prostate cancer
    Jakobsen, Niels Asger
    Hamdy, Freddie Charles
    Bryant, Richard John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 9 (02) : 3 - 10
  • [26] Known epigenetic biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and management: exploring the potential of blood-based liquid biopsies
    Constancio, Vera
    Barros-Silva, Daniela
    Jeronimo, Carmen
    Henrique, Rui
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 19 (05) : 367 - 375
  • [27] Blood-based biomarkers for detecting aggressive prostate cancer at time of biopsy.
    Nam, R. K.
    Marshall, K. W.
    Zheng, R.
    Zhang, H. W.
    Narod, S. A.
    Liew, C. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 250S - 250S
  • [28] Blood-based Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Review Article
    Maharjan, Narayani
    Thapa, Niresh
    Tu, Jiancheng
    JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 58 (227) : 519 - 524
  • [29] Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for detection of advanced colorectal adenomas: A systematic review
    Goyal, R.
    Wassie, M.
    Winter, J.
    Lathlean, T.
    Young, G.
    Symonds, E.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 : 30 - 31
  • [30] PlateletSeq: A novel method for discovery of blood-based biomarkers
    Collinson, Ryan J.
    Boey, Darren
    Wilson, Lynne
    Ng, Zi Yun
    Mirzai, Bob
    Chuah, Hun
    Leahy, Michael F.
    Howman, Rebecca
    Linden, Matthew
    Fuller, Kathy
    Erber, Wendy N.
    Guo, Belinda B.
    METHODS, 2023, 219 : 139 - 149