Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions

被引:101
|
作者
Hendriks, R. J. [1 ]
van Oort, I. M. [1 ]
Schalken, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH INDEX PHI; ANTIGEN; 3; PCA3; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; FUSION TRANSCRIPTS; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; GENE FUSION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPROVE; MEN; SERUM;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.59
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on serum PSA testing and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and histopathologic evaluation of prostate biopsies. The main drawback of PSA testing is the lack of specificity for PCa. To improve early detection of PCa more specific biomarkers are needed. In the past few years, many new promising biomarkers have been identified; however, to date, only a few have reached clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we discuss new blood-based and urinary biomarker models that are promising for usage in PCa detection, follow-up and treatment decision-making. These include Prostate Health Index (PHI), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), four-kallikrein panel (4K), transmembrane protease serine 2-ERG (TMPRSS2-ERG), ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, SelectMDx and the Mi-Prostate score. Only few head-to-head studies are available for these new fluid-based biomarkers and/or models. The blood-based PHI and urinary PCA3 are two US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers for diagnosis of PCa. In the second part of this review, we give an overview of published studies comparing these two available biomarkers for prediction of (1) PCa upon prostate biopsy, (2) pathological features in radical prostatectomy specimen and (3) significant PCa in patients eligible for active surveillance. RESULTS: Studies show opposing results in comparison of PHI with PCA3 for prediction of PCa upon initial and repeat prostate biopsy. PHI and PCA3 are able to predict pathological findings on radical prostatectomy specimen, such as tumor volume and Gleason score. Only PHI could predict seminal vesicle invasion and only PCA3 could predict multifocality. There is some evidence that PHI outperforms PCA3 in predicting significant PCa in an active surveillance population. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on independent validation of promising fluid-based biomarkers/models, and prospective comparison of biomarkers with each other.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions
    R J Hendriks
    I M van Oort
    J A Schalken
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2017, 20 : 12 - 19
  • [2] Blood-based biomarkers for prostate cancer
    Velonas, V. M.
    Remedios, C. D.
    Woo, H.
    Ho, J. W. K.
    Assinder, S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 108 - 108
  • [3] Blood-based biomarkers in lung cancer: prognosis and treatment decisions
    Xu-Welliver, Meng
    Carbone, David P.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (06) : 708 - 712
  • [4] Detection and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer Using Blood-Based Biomarkers
    Jin, Wei
    Fei, Xiang
    Wang, Xia
    Song, Yan
    Chen, Fangjie
    MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Blood-Based Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer
    Liong, Men Long
    Lim, Chun Ren
    Yang, Hengxuan
    Chao, Samuel
    Bong, Chin Wei
    Leong, Wing Seng
    Das, Prashanta Kumar
    Loh, Chit Sin
    Lau, Ban Eng
    Yu, Choon Geok
    Ooi, Edie Jian Jiek
    Nam, Robert K.
    Allen, Paul D.
    Steele, Graeme S.
    Wassmann, Karl
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Liew, Choong Chin
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [6] Blood-based tumor biomarkers in lung cancer for detection and treatment
    Mamdani, Hirva
    Ahmed, Shahid
    Armstrong, Samantha
    Mok, Tony
    Jalal, Shadia I.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (06) : 648 - 660
  • [7] Emerging blood-based biomarkers for detection of gastric cancer
    Zane Kalni?a
    Irēna Meistere
    Ilze Kikuste
    Ivars Tolmanis
    Pawel Zayakin
    Aija Linē
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21 (41) : 11636 - 11653
  • [8] Emerging blood-based biomarkers for detection of gastric cancer
    Kalnina, Zane
    Meistere, Irena
    Kikuste, Ilze
    Tolmanis, Ivars
    Zayakin, Pawel
    Line, Aija
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (41) : 11636 - 11653
  • [9] Novel Blood-Based Biomarkers for HCC
    Pai S.
    Parikh N.D.
    Current Hepatology Reports, 2024, 23 (1) : 174 - 184
  • [10] Colorectal Cancer Blood-Based Biomarkers
    Hauptman, Nina
    Glavac, Damjan
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 2017