Friedewald-Estimated Versus Directly Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Treatment Implications

被引:300
|
作者
Martin, Seth S. [1 ]
Blaha, Michael J. [1 ]
Elshazly, Mohamed B. [1 ]
Brinton, Eliot A. [2 ,3 ]
Toth, Peter P. [4 ,5 ]
McEvoy, John W. [1 ]
Joshi, Parag H. [1 ]
Kulkarni, Krishnaji R. [6 ]
Mize, Patrick D. [6 ]
Kwiterovich, Peter O. [1 ]
DeFilippis, Andrew P. [1 ,7 ]
Blumenthal, Roger S. [1 ]
Jones, Steven R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Ctr Prevent Heart Dis, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Utah Fdn Biomed Res, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Utah Lipid Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] CGH Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Cardiol, Sterling, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[6] Atherotech Diagnost Lab, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Univ Louisville, Div Cardiol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Friedewald equation; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; very low density lipoprotein cholesterol; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; UNITED-STATES; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare Friedewald-estimated and directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values. Background LDL-C is routinely estimated by the Friedewald equation to guide treatment; however, compatibility with direct measurement has received relatively little scrutiny, especially at levels <70 mg/dl now targeted in high-risk patients. Methods We examined 1,340,614 U. S. adults who underwent lipid profiling by vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation (Atherotech, Birmingham, Alabama) from 2009 to 2011. Following standard practice, Friedewald LDL-C was not estimated if triglyceride levels were >= 400 mg/dl (n = 30,174), yielding 1,310,440 total patients and 191,333 patients with Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dl. Results Patients were 59 +/- 15 years of age and 52% were women. Lipid distributions closely matched those in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A greater difference in the Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured LDL-C occurred at lower LDL-C and higher triglyceride levels. If the Friedewald-estimated LDL-C was <70 mg/dl, the median directly measured LDL-C was 9.0 mg/dl higher (5th to 95th percentiles, 1.8 to 15.4 mg/dl) when triglyceride levels were 150 to 199 mg/dl and 18.4 mg/dl higher (5th to 95th percentiles, 6.6 to 36.0 mg/dl) when triglyceride levels were 200 to 399 mg/dl. Of patients with a Friedewald-estimated LDL-C <70 mg/dl, 23% had a directly measured LDL-C >= 70 mg/dl (39% if triglyceride levels were concurrently 150 to 199 mg/dl; 59% if triglyceride levels were concurrently 200 to 399 mg/dl). Conclusions The Friedewald equation tends to underestimate LDL-C most when accuracy is most crucial. Especially if triglyceride levels are >= 150 mg/dl, Friedewald estimation commonly classifies LDL-C as <70 mg/dl despite directly measured levels >= 70 mg/dl, and therefore additional evaluation is warranted in high-risk patients. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 739
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of two methods of estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the direct versus Friedewald estimation
    Sahu S.
    Chawla R.
    Uppal B.
    Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2005, 20 (2) : 54 - 61
  • [32] Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the reliability of the Friedewald formula in the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations
    Tremblay, AJ
    Bergeron, J
    Gagné, JM
    Gagné, C
    Couture, P
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2005, 54 (08): : 1014 - 1019
  • [33] Magnitude of Benefit in Statin Trials Is Directly Related to On-Treatment Differential in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A.
    Jafri, Haseeb
    Karas, Richard H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A202 - A202
  • [34] Relativism and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    McCarthy, Cian P.
    McEvoy, John W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (22) : 2773 - 2774
  • [35] Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Arsenault, Benoit J.
    Rana, Jamal S.
    Stroes, Erik S. G.
    Despres, Jean-Pierre
    Shah, Prediman K.
    Kastelein, John J. P.
    Wareham, Nicholas J.
    Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 55 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [36] CYCLOSPORINE, LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN, AND CHOLESTEROL
    DEGROEN, PC
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 63 (10) : 1012 - 1021
  • [37] Friedewald equation underestimates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at low concentrations in young people with and without Type 1 diabetes
    Sibal, L.
    Neely, R. D. G.
    Jones, A.
    Home, P. D.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [38] Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering treatment: the current approach
    Crismaru, Irina
    Pantea Stoian, Anca
    Bratu, Ovidiu Gabriel
    Gaman, Mihnea-Alexandru
    Stanescu, Ana Maria Alexandra
    Bacalbasa, Nicolae
    Diaconu, Camelia Cristina
    LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [39] A practical guide to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment targets
    Naidoo, Shanil
    SA PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 82 (09) : 13 - 16
  • [40] Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering treatment: the current approach
    Irina Crismaru
    Anca Pantea Stoian
    Ovidiu Gabriel Bratu
    Mihnea-Alexandru Gaman
    Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu
    Nicolae Bacalbasa
    Camelia Cristina Diaconu
    Lipids in Health and Disease, 19