Friedewald-Estimated Versus Directly Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Treatment Implications

被引:300
|
作者
Martin, Seth S. [1 ]
Blaha, Michael J. [1 ]
Elshazly, Mohamed B. [1 ]
Brinton, Eliot A. [2 ,3 ]
Toth, Peter P. [4 ,5 ]
McEvoy, John W. [1 ]
Joshi, Parag H. [1 ]
Kulkarni, Krishnaji R. [6 ]
Mize, Patrick D. [6 ]
Kwiterovich, Peter O. [1 ]
DeFilippis, Andrew P. [1 ,7 ]
Blumenthal, Roger S. [1 ]
Jones, Steven R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Ctr Prevent Heart Dis, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Utah Fdn Biomed Res, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Utah Lipid Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] CGH Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Cardiol, Sterling, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[6] Atherotech Diagnost Lab, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Univ Louisville, Div Cardiol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Friedewald equation; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; very low density lipoprotein cholesterol; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; UNITED-STATES; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare Friedewald-estimated and directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values. Background LDL-C is routinely estimated by the Friedewald equation to guide treatment; however, compatibility with direct measurement has received relatively little scrutiny, especially at levels <70 mg/dl now targeted in high-risk patients. Methods We examined 1,340,614 U. S. adults who underwent lipid profiling by vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation (Atherotech, Birmingham, Alabama) from 2009 to 2011. Following standard practice, Friedewald LDL-C was not estimated if triglyceride levels were >= 400 mg/dl (n = 30,174), yielding 1,310,440 total patients and 191,333 patients with Friedewald LDL-C <70 mg/dl. Results Patients were 59 +/- 15 years of age and 52% were women. Lipid distributions closely matched those in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A greater difference in the Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured LDL-C occurred at lower LDL-C and higher triglyceride levels. If the Friedewald-estimated LDL-C was <70 mg/dl, the median directly measured LDL-C was 9.0 mg/dl higher (5th to 95th percentiles, 1.8 to 15.4 mg/dl) when triglyceride levels were 150 to 199 mg/dl and 18.4 mg/dl higher (5th to 95th percentiles, 6.6 to 36.0 mg/dl) when triglyceride levels were 200 to 399 mg/dl. Of patients with a Friedewald-estimated LDL-C <70 mg/dl, 23% had a directly measured LDL-C >= 70 mg/dl (39% if triglyceride levels were concurrently 150 to 199 mg/dl; 59% if triglyceride levels were concurrently 200 to 399 mg/dl). Conclusions The Friedewald equation tends to underestimate LDL-C most when accuracy is most crucial. Especially if triglyceride levels are >= 150 mg/dl, Friedewald estimation commonly classifies LDL-C as <70 mg/dl despite directly measured levels >= 70 mg/dl, and therefore additional evaluation is warranted in high-risk patients. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 739
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol &lt;70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method
    Whelton, Seamus P.
    Meeusen, Jeffrey W.
    Donato, Leslie J.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Saenger, Amy
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Blumenthal, Roger S.
    Jones, Steven R.
    Martin, Seth S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2017, 11 (04) : 1065 - 1072
  • [2] Effects of total cholesterol and triglyceride on the percentage difference between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration measured directly and calculated using the Friedewald formula
    Jun, Kyung Ran
    Park, Hae-il
    Chun, Sail
    Park, Hlyosoon
    Min, Won-Ki
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 46 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [3] DETERMINATION OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN-CHOLESTEROL BY THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA
    DEMACKER, PNM
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1985, 4 (09) : R6 - R7
  • [4] A comparison of directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol on the Roche Cobas Integra 800, versus the use of the Friedewald formula.
    Anne, CJ
    Rajaram, S
    Omar, A
    Wong, MS
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 : A137 - A137
  • [5] Performance of Calculated and Directly Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in a Pediatric Population
    Roper, Stephen M.
    Cao, Jing
    Tam, Estella
    Devaraj, Sridevi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 148 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [6] Is directly measured low-density lipoprotein clinically equivalent to calculated low-density lipoprotein?
    Baruch, Lawrence
    Agarwal, Sanjay
    Gupta, Bhanu
    Haynos, Ann
    Johnson, Swapna
    Kelly-Johnson, Katelyn
    Eng, Calvin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2010, 4 (04) : 259 - 264
  • [7] Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level calculated using the modified Martin/Hopkins estimation or the Friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
    Reiber, Istvan
    Mark, Laszlo
    Paragh, Gyorgy
    Toth, Peter
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 18 (03) : 577 - 586
  • [8] Assessing the Accuracy of Estimated Lipoprotein(a) Cholesterol and Lipoprotein(a)-Free Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Zheng, Weili
    Chilazi, Michael
    Park, Jihwan
    Sathiyakumar, Vasanth
    Donato, Leslie J.
    Meeusen, Jeffrey W.
    Lazo, Mariana
    Guallar, Eliseo
    Kulkarni, Krishnaji R.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Santos, Raul D.
    Toth, Peter P.
    Jones, Steven R.
    Martin, Seth S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [9] Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations by Direct Measurement and by Friedewald Calculation
    Sung, Ki-Chul
    Kwon, Chang Hee
    Lee, Mi Yeon
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Lee, Ju Hee
    Jung, Mi-Hyang
    Shin, Jeong-Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 125 (06): : 866 - 873
  • [10] Comparison of calculated and directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Lee, J. H.
    Chae, S. C.
    Jeong, M. H.
    Kim, Y. J.
    Kim, K. S.
    Hur, S. H.
    Seong, I. W.
    Hong, T. J.
    Cho, M. C.
    Kim, C. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 958 - 959