QUERYING AND REASONING WITH PRODUCT ENGINEERING ONTOLOGIES - MOVING PAST MODELING

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Lijuan [1 ]
Jayaram, Uma [1 ]
Jayaram, Sankar [1 ]
Kim, OkJoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, VRCIM Lab, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Much of the work in ontologies for product engineering has focused on the modeling of these ontologies. A key characteristic of an ontology model is that it uses a logic-based and formal specification to represent the information model, thus allowing querying and reasoning. In order to take advantage of this, we seek to move past ontology modeling and focus on developing meaningful reasoning mechanisms that are applicable for the domain of product engineering a) to allow the user to make basic inferences such as checking consistency for definitions of concepts, b) to query and retrieve existing product data information, and c) to derive new product data information not explicitly expressed in knowledge bases. A typical semantic application architecture consisting of knowledge base layer, logic reasoning layer, and application interface layer is adopted. Reasoning units are deployed in the logic reasoning layer of this architecture. These reasoning units act on the knowledge base for product engineering, specifically, the domain of product assembly constraint. SWRL & SQWRL are used to define the retrieval specifications and inference rules. User interfaces are also developed to help users submit the reasoning tasks, view the results, and thus assess the knowledge base indirectly and transparently. It is concluded that the reasoning mechanism exploits and extends the semantic representation made possible through ontology and holds promise for improved knowledge discovery and understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reasoning about Moving Target Defense in Attack Modeling Formalisms
    Ballot, Gabriel
    Malvone, Vadim
    Leneutre, Jean
    Borde, Etienne
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH ACM WORKSHOP ON MOVING TARGET DEFENSE, MTD 2022, 2022, : 55 - 65
  • [22] Spatio-temporal data types: An approach to modeling and querying moving objects in databases
    Erwig M.
    Güting R.H.
    Schneider M.
    Vazirgiannis M.
    GeoInformatica, 1999, 3 (3) : 269 - 296
  • [23] Semantic Modeling and Reasoning at Runtime for Autonomous Systems Engineering
    Chaari, Tarak
    Fakhfakh, Kaouthar
    2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING AND 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMIC & TRUSTED COMPUTING (UIC/ATC), 2012, : 415 - 422
  • [24] Enabling product traceability through data modeling and semantic web service ontologies
    Bendriss, Sabri
    Benabdelhafid, Abdellatif
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORT (ICALT), 2013, : 365 - 370
  • [25] Object-oriented product configuration modeling and constraint reasoning
    Zhou, Yi-Ting
    Yang, Dong
    Wu, Hong-Wei
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2009, 15 (04): : 652 - 660
  • [26] Moving Toward Product Line Engineering in a Nuclear Industry Consortium
    Ben Nasr, Sana
    Sannier, Nicolas
    Acher, Mathieu
    Baudry, Benoit
    18TH INTERNATIONAL SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE CONFERENCE (SPLC 2014), VOL 1, 2014, : 294 - 303
  • [27] Product modeling methods in collaborative engineering environments
    Horvath, L
    Varga, T
    INES'97 : 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 517 - 522
  • [28] A Formal Engineering Approach to Product Family Modeling
    Wang, Xi
    Khedri, Ridha
    Miao, Weikai
    2021 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (TASE 2021), 2021, : 87 - 94
  • [30] 8.5.2 Structural Modeling in Biomedical and Product Engineering
    2829 West Cantey Street, Fort Worth
    TX
    76109, United States
    INCOSE Int. Sym., 2013, 1 (560-574):