Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

被引:17
|
作者
Hauck, Melanie [1 ]
Bauer, Alexander [1 ]
Voss, Frederik [1 ]
Katus, Hugo A. [1 ]
Becker, Ruediger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Cardiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
persistent atrial fibrillation; cardiac resynchronisation therapy; sinus rhythm; defibrillator; spontaneous conversion; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; MORTALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-008-0740-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spontaneous conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (SR) has anecdotally been reported following cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This monocenter observational study was designed to estimate the incidence of spontaneous conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to SR in consecutive patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation device. A total of 46 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (a parts per thousand yen4 weeks pre-implant), left bundle branch block (QRS > 130 ms), left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.35 and NYHA III or IV heart failure were implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker or defibrillator and followed for at least 6 months between 6/2000 to 12/2006. During 22 +/- A 9 (7-34) months of follow-up, eight out of 46 patients (17%) converted to SR. Spontaneous conversion was encountered in seven cases, whereas one patient converted due to an ICD shock delivered for ventricular tachycardia; in the latter patient, previous ICD shocks had not converted atrial fibrillation. The time interval from device implantation to conversion was 12 +/- A 11 (3-31) months. In patients converting to SR, the duration of atrial fibrillation before device implantation was significantly shorter than in patients remaining in atrial fibrillation (15 +/- A 13 vs. 53 +/- A 58 months, P = 0.001). Echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular enddiastolic diameter, left atrial diameter did not differ significantly between converting and non-converting patients. However, patients converting to SR showed a significant reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure on CRT vs. before CRT (45 +/- A 13 vs. 29 +/- A 5 mmHg, P = 0.008). This pilot study suggests that CRT favors spontaneous conversion of persistent AF to SR in a minority of patients. If confirmed by larger clinical studies, atrial lead implantation would be encouraged in these patients, in order to provide AV synchronous pacing in case of spontaneous conversion or successful cardioversion to SR on cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients vs. patients in sinus rhythm: the role of atrioventricular junction ablation
    Ferreira, Antonio M.
    Adragao, Pedro
    Cavaco, Diogo M.
    Candeias, Rui
    Morgado, Francisco B.
    Santos, Katya R.
    Santos, Emilia
    Silva, Jose A.
    EUROPACE, 2008, 10 (07): : 809 - 815
  • [42] New-onset atrial fibrillation versus maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardiac resynchronization therapy: incidence and patient characteristics
    Borleffs, C. J. W.
    Ypenburg, C.
    Van Bommel, R. J.
    Van Erven, L.
    Van der Wall, E. E.
    Schalij, M. J.
    Bax, J. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 25 - 25
  • [43] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Ramadan, Mohammad
    Refaat, Marwan M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2403 - 2404
  • [44] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in permanent atrial fibrillation
    Joana Correia, J.
    Ferreira, G.
    Fiuza, J.
    Neto, V.
    Almeida, M.
    Costa Cabral, J.
    Costa, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 210 - 210
  • [45] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Mechanisms in Atrial Fibrillation
    Whinnett, Zachary I.
    Francis, Darrel P.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2013, 9 (04) : 475 - +
  • [46] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Gasparini, Maurizio
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Lunati, Maurizio
    Landolina, Maurizio
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Santini, Massimo
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Lamp, Barbara
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Curnis, Antonio
    Klersy, Catherine
    Leyva, Francisco
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 1 (06) : 500 - 507
  • [47] Atrial Fibrillation During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kloosterman, Marielle
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2017, 13 (01) : 179 - 192
  • [48] Importance of Sinus Rhythm as Endpoint of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
    Ammar, Sonia
    Hessling, Gabriele
    Reents, Tilko
    Paulik, Maria
    Fichtner, Stephanie
    Schoen, Patrick
    Dillier, Roger
    Kathan, Susanne
    Jilek, Clemens
    Kolb, Christof
    Haller, Bernhard
    Deisenhofer, Isabel
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (04) : 388 - 395
  • [49] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Does Not Prevent Atrial Fibrillation But Atrial Fibrillation Prevents Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adversely Impacts Outcomes
    Saxon, Leslie A.
    Schwartz, Jacqueline
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (09) : 1235 - 1237
  • [50] Cardiac resynchronization therapy after atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
    Akhyt, B.
    Berkinbayev, S. F.
    Koshumbayeva, K. M.
    Rekvava, R. R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2020, 19 (1_SUPPL) : S41 - S42