Routine laboratory biomarkers used to predict Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria involved in bloodstream infections

被引:9
|
作者
Dambroso-Altafini, Daniela [1 ,3 ]
Menegucci, Thatiany C. [2 ]
Costa, Bruno B. [3 ]
Moreira, Rafael R. B. [3 ]
Nishiyama, Sheila A. B. [1 ]
Mazucheli, Josmar [4 ]
Tognim, Maria C. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Basic Hlth Sci, Lab Microbiol, Ave Colombo 5790, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Paranaense, Dept Med, Umuarama, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Maringa, Maringa Univ Hosp, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Stat, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; SEPSIS; MORTALITY; CULTURES; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-19643-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study evaluated routine laboratory biomarkers (RLB) to predict the infectious bacterial group, Gram-positive (GP) or Gram-negative (GN) associated with bloodstream infection (BSI) before the result of blood culture (BC). A total of 13,574 BC of 6787 patients (217 BSI-GP and 238 BSI-GN) and 68 different RLB from these were analyzed. The logistic regression model was built considering BSI-GP or BSI-GN as response variable and RLB as covariates. After four filters applied total of 320 patients and 16 RLB remained in the Complete-Model-CM, and 4 RLB in the Reduced-Model-RM (RLB p > 0.05 excluded). In the RM, only platelets, creatinine, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and erythrocytes were used. The reproductivity of both models were applied to a test bank of 2019. The new model presented values to predict BSI-GN of the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and 0.69 for CM and RM, respectively; with sensitivity of 0.62 and 0.61 (CM and RM) and specificity of 0.67 for both. These data confirm the discriminatory capacity of the new models for BSI-GN (p = 0.64). AUC of 0.69 using only 4 RLB, associated with the patient's clinical data could be useful for better targeted antimicrobial therapy in BSI.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The diagnostic ability of procalcitonin to differentiate Gram-negative bacteria from Gram-positive bacteria and fungal bloodstream infections in critically ill patients
    Wang, Di
    Tao, Xiaogen
    Guo, Wei
    Liu, Haihua
    Cheng, Shaohui
    Wang, Jinquan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION, 2019, 17 : 1 - 6
  • [22] METHODS FOR DISTINGUISHING GRAM-POSITIVE FROM GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    CARLONE, GM
    VALADEZ, MJ
    PICKETT, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1982, 16 (06) : 1157 - 1159
  • [23] INFLUENCE OF CIPROFLOXACIN ON THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA
    VOIGT, WH
    ZEILER, HJ
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG/DRUG RESEARCH, 1985, 35-2 (10): : 1600 - 1603
  • [24] Undecaprenyl phosphate metabolism in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
    Kawakami, Naoki
    Fujisaki, Shingo
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 82 (06) : 940 - 946
  • [26] A RELIABLE METHOD FOR DEMONSTRATING GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    GARVEY, W
    FATHI, A
    BIGELOW, F
    CARPENTER, B
    JIMENEZ, C
    STAIN TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 61 (04): : 251 - 253
  • [27] UTILIZATION OF MAGNESIUM BY CERTAIN GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    WEBB, M
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1966, 43 (03): : 401 - &
  • [28] MECHANISM OF CHLORPROMAZINE BINDING BY GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    MOLNAR, J
    FISCHER, J
    NAKAMURA, MJ
    ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 62 (04): : 309 - 314
  • [29] GROWTH OF GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA IN PLATELET CONCENTRATES
    PUNSALANG, A
    HEAL, JM
    MURPHY, PJ
    TRANSFUSION, 1989, 29 (07) : 596 - 599
  • [30] Type IV secretion in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
    Grohmann, Elisabeth
    Christie, Peter J.
    Waksman, Gabriel
    Backert, Steffen
    MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (04) : 455 - 471