Induced Astigmatism With 2.2-and 3.0-mm Coaxial Phacoemulsification Incisions

被引:94
|
作者
Masket, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Li [3 ]
Belani, Shaleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Adv Vis Care, Los Angeles, CA 90067 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CATARACT-SURGERY;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20090101-04
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference between 2.2-mm incision micro-coaxial phacoemulsification and traditional 3.0-mm coaxial phacoemulsification with respect to surgically induced astigmatism after temporally oriented clear corneal incision cataract surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, intra-patient controlled study comprised 22 patients who underwent clear corneal cataract surgery in both eyes. One eye received 2.2-mm incision micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the fellow eye received traditional 3.0 mm coaxial incision phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. The 2.2-mm incisions were created with a diamond keratome after a 200-mu m groove was constructed in clear cornea at the temporal limbus. The 3.0-mm incisions were created without a pre-cut groove, using a metal keratome. All cases were uncomplicated. Pre- and postoperative keratometric astigmatism at 6 weeks was measured using a hand held Nikon Retinomax K-plus 2 Autorefractor. Three methods were used to analyze the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) data: 1) algebraic analysis of the magnitude of keratometric astigmatism induced by the surgery, 2) magnitude of SIA by vector analysis, and 3) aggregate analysis of astigmatism using vector analysis. RESULTS: The mean change in the magnitude of keratometric astigmatism was 0.10 +/- 0.08 dopters (D) with the 2.2 mm micro-coaxial incisions and 0.32 +/- 0.20 D with the 3.0-mm traditional incisions (P=.0002). Using vector analysis, the mean magnitude of SIA was 0.35 +/- 0.21 D with the 2.2-mm incisions and 0.67 +/- 0.48 D (P=.006) with the 3.0-mm incisions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically induced astigmatism with 2.2-nm micro-coaxial incisions and traditional 3.0-mm clear corneal incisions with intra-patient control resulted in statistically and clinically significant reduction in surgically induced astigmatism with the smaller incision size. [J. Refract Surg. 2009;25:21-24.]
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 24
页数:4
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Clinical evaluation of surgery-induced astigmatism in cataract surgery using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xiu
    Zhang, Hong
    Pang, Yi
    Wei, Rui-Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (01) : 68 - 71
  • [22] Surgically induced astigmatism after superotemporal and superonasal dear corneal incisions in phacoemulsification
    Ermis, SS
    Inan, ÜÜ
    Öztürk, F
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (06): : 1316 - 1319
  • [23] Surgically induced astigmatism after 3.0 mm temporal and nasal clear corneal incisions in bilateral cataract surgery Reply
    Kelkar, Aditya S.
    Kelkar, Jai A.
    Kelkar, Shreekant B.
    Bhanushali, Devanshi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 62 (06)
  • [24] SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM AFTER 2.8 MM TEMPORAL AND NASAL CLEAR CORNEAL INCISIONS IN PHACOEMULSIFICATION CATARACT SURGERY OF SAME PATIENT
    Garg, Preeti
    Gupta, Chetanya P.
    Gupta, Daya Chand
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (31): : 5308 - 5313
  • [25] Astigmatism after phacoemulsification with adjusted and unadjusted sutured versus sutureless 5.2 mm superior scleral incisions
    Lyhne, N
    Corydon, L
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (09): : 1206 - 1210
  • [26] Effect of temporal and nasal unsutured limbal tunnel incisions on induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification
    Kohnen, S
    Neuber, R
    Kohnen, T
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (05): : 821 - 825
  • [27] COMPARISON OF CORNEAL PACHYMETRY CHANGES AND SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM OF MICROCOAXIAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY AND COAXIAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY
    Altikurt, Emre
    Gozum, Nilufer
    Cebeci, Zafer
    Tas, Aye Yildiz
    Gucukoglu, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2018, 81 (03): : 77 - 83
  • [28] Comparative Outcomes of Bimanual MICS and 2.2-mm Coaxial Phacoemulsification Assisted by Femtosecond Technology
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Soria, Felipe
    Abdou, Ahmed A.
    Pena-Garcia, Pablo
    Fernandez-Buenaga, Roberto
    Javaloy, Jaime
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (01) : 34 - U40
  • [29] Evaluation of 5 different incisions for phacoemulsification: Follow-up surgically induced astigmatism.
    Rossetti, L
    Nizzola, F
    Torrazza, C
    Orzalesi, N
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 2710 - 2710
  • [30] Surgically induced astigmatism after biaxial phacoemulsification compared to coaxial phacoemulsification (vol 23, pg 835, 2009)
    Morcillo-Laiz, R.
    Zato, M. A.
    Munoz-Negrete, F. J.
    Arnalich-Montiel, F.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (05) : 1246 - 1246