Performance at MRCP(UK): when should trainees sit examinations?

被引:5
|
作者
Pinheiro-Torres, C. [1 ]
Tang, P. [1 ]
Dacre, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MRCP UK, London, England
[2] UCL Med Sch, London, England
关键词
examination pass rates; foundation trainees; medical training; MRCP(UK); MEDICAL-SCHOOLS;
D O I
10.7861/clinmedicine.13-2-166
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This paper analyses candidate performance in the three components of the MRCP(UK) examination to establish when they are most likely to pass. Using data from the 2010 and 2011 MRCP(UK) examinations, pass rates of candidates who gained their primary medical qualification (PMQ) in 2005 or later were analysed. Results from a total of 22,827 candidates were included in the study: 12,517 (54.8%) from Part 1, 5,545 (24.3%) from Part 2 written and 4,765 (20.9%) from the Part 2 practical assessment of clinical examination skills (PACES). The results show that candidates are more likely to pass Part 1 and Part 2 written 12-24 months after graduation and to pass Part 2 PACES 25-36 months after graduation. When we consider the training programme for physicians in the UK, successful candidates are likely to be in foundation programmes or early core or specialty training when they achieve success. At the moment, some candidates are dissuaded from taking the examination during their foundation programme, but our data show that their likelihood of success is highest during this period of training. The analysis also shows that for candidates who fail their first attempt, delaying their next attempt by one diet significantly increases the likelihood of them passing at their next attempt.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 169
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country
    Unwin, Emily
    Potts, Henry W. W.
    Dacre, Jane
    Elder, Andrew
    Woolf, Katherine
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [42] Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country
    Emily Unwin
    Henry W. W. Potts
    Jane Dacre
    Andrew Elder
    Katherine Woolf
    BMC Medical Education, 18
  • [43] When should the errors in the UK's breast screening programme have been spotted?
    Sheikh, Shama
    Sasieni, Peter
    LANCET, 2018, 391 (10137): : 2319 - 2320
  • [44] Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used?
    Seijts, GH
    Latham, GP
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2005, 19 (01): : 124 - 131
  • [45] An analysis of radon levels in the basements of UK workplaces and review of when employers should test
    Gooding, Tracy D.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2018, 38 (01) : 247 - 261
  • [46] A procedure to determine when safety performance functions should be recalibrated
    Shirazi, Mohammadali
    Geedipally, Srinivas Reddy
    Lord, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2017, 9 (04) : 457 - 469
  • [47] Performance in the MRCP(UK) Examination 2003-4: analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self-declared ethnicity and gender
    Dewhurst, Neil G.
    McManus, Chris
    Mollon, Jennifer
    Dacre, Jane E.
    Vale, Allister J.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2007, 5
  • [48] An evaluation of the performance of UK and International Medical Graduates in the MRCOG Part 2 OSCE examinations
    Rushd, S.
    Landau, A.
    Lindow, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 318 - 318
  • [49] WHEN SHOULD WE PERFORM ILEOSCOPY DURING COLONOSCOPY? EVIDENCE FROM A UK TERTIARY CENTRE
    Sami, S. S.
    Sebastian, S.
    GUT, 2009, 58 : A134 - A134
  • [50] If competency is not enough, how should we approach surgical education? A comparative study on the role of trust for surgical trainees in Japan and in the UK
    Komori, Hiroka
    Di Napoli, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 364 - 364