The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning

被引:395
作者
Koedinger, Kenneth R. [1 ,2 ]
Corbett, Albert T. [1 ]
Perfetti, Charles [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Human Comp Interact Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Learning Res & Dev Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Instructional principles; Learning principles; Knowledge representation; Cognitive modeling; Education; Experimentation; Cognitive task analysis; WORKED-OUT EXAMPLES; DISTRIBUTED PRACTICE; SELF-EXPLANATIONS; COMPLEX SKILL; ACQUISITION; PRINCIPLES; EXPERTISE; TEXT; DISCRIMINATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Despite the accumulation of substantial cognitive science research relevant to education, there remains confusion and controversy in the application of research to educational practice. In support of a more systematic approach, we describe the Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework. KLI promotes the emergence of instructional principles of high potential for generality, while explicitly identifying constraints of and opportunities for detailed analysis of the knowledge students may acquire in courses. Drawing on research across domains of science, math, and language learning, we illustrate the analyses of knowledge, learning, and instructional events that the KLI framework affords. We present a set of three coordinated taxonomies of knowledge, learning, and instruction. For example, we identify three broad classes of learning events (LEs): (a) memory and fluency processes, (b) induction and refinement processes, and (c) understanding and sense-making processes, and we show how these can lead to different knowledge changes and constraints on optimal instructional choices.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 798
页数:42
相关论文
共 126 条
[71]   TOWARD AN INSTANCE THEORY OF AUTOMATIZATION [J].
LOGAN, GD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (04) :492-527
[72]  
MacLaren B, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2363, P355
[73]  
Matsuda N, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5091, P111
[74]  
McClelland J.L., 2009, Oxford Companion to Consciousness
[75]   Teaching the |r|-|1| discrimination to Japanese adults:: behavioral and neural aspects [J].
McClelland, JL ;
Fiez, JA ;
McCandliss, BD .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 77 (4-5) :657-662
[76]   Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text [J].
McNamara, DS ;
Kintsch, E ;
Songer, NB ;
Kintsch, W .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1996, 14 (01) :1-43
[77]   SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training [J].
McNamara, DS .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2004, 38 (01) :1-30
[78]   Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge [J].
McNamara, DS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2001, 55 (01) :51-62
[79]   CONTEXT THEORY OF CLASSIFICATION LEARNING [J].
MEDIN, DL ;
SCHAFFER, MM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (03) :207-238
[80]   Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life [J].
Michaels, Sarah ;
O'Connor, Catherine ;
Resnick, Lauren B. .
STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION, 2008, 27 (04) :283-297