Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks

被引:186
|
作者
Stagoll, Karen [1 ]
Lindenmayer, David B. [1 ]
Knight, Emma [2 ]
Fischer, Joern [1 ,3 ]
Manning, Adrian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Math & Its Applicat, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ Luneburg, Dept Sustainabil Sci, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2012年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Birds; city parks; science-based management; scattered trees; southeastern Australia; tree preservation; urban biodiversity; urban conservation policy; urban ecology; urban forest; SOUTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA; SCATTERED TREES; BIRD COMMUNITIES; RURAL LANDSCAPES; HERITAGE TREES; OLD TREES; HABITAT; FORESTS; CONSERVATION; ABUNDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00216.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Large trees are considered keystone structures in agricultural and forestry production landscapes, but research demonstrating this in urban landscapes is urgently needed. If large trees are keystone structures in urban parks, it is imperative that this is recognized in policy to ensure their ongoing existence. We studied the role of large native trees for birds in urban parks in Canberra, Australia. We found that (1) large trees had a consistent, strong, and positive relationship with five measures of bird diversity, and (2) as trees became larger in size, their positive effect on bird diversity increased. Large urban trees are therefore keystone structures that provide crucial habitat resources for wildlife. Hence, it is vital that they are managed appropriately. With evidence-based tree preservation policies that recognize biodiversity values, and proactive planning for future large trees, the protection and perpetuation of these important keystone structures can be achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Large Deviations for Random Trees and the Branching of RNA Secondary Structures
    Yuri Bakhtin
    Christine E. Heitsch
    Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2009, 71 : 84 - 106
  • [42] Urban parks and open space
    Teska, RB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (01) : 96 - 97
  • [43] THE GROUNDCOVER IN URBAN PARKS OF LUBLIN
    Trzaskowska, Ewa
    Adamiec, Pawel
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-FORMATIO CIRCUMIECTUS, 2011, 10 (04) : 51 - 59
  • [44] The Cooling Effect of Large-Scale Urban Parks on Surrounding Area Thermal Comfort
    Aram, Farshid
    Solgi, Ebrahim
    Higueras Garcia, Ester
    Mosavi, Amir
    Varkonyi-Koczy, Annamaria R.
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (20)
  • [45] Urban Parks in the Twentieth Century
    Tate, Alan
    ENVIRONMENT AND HISTORY, 2018, 24 (01) : 81 - 101
  • [46] Eliciting preferences for urban parks
    Panduro, Toke Emil
    Jensen, Cathrine Ulla
    Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark
    von Graevenitz, Kathrine
    Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2018, 73 : 127 - 142
  • [47] USE AND IMAGE OF URBAN PARKS
    GALINDO, PM
    ARIAS, AM
    CASTRO, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 630 - 630
  • [48] Soil diatoms of urban parks
    Sukhanova, NV
    Fazlutdinova, AI
    Khaibullina, LS
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2000, 33 (07) : 733 - 738
  • [49] Just sustainability in urban parks
    Seymour, Mona
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 17 (02) : 167 - 185
  • [50] PARKS LOST TO URBAN SQUEEZE
    FORER, LG
    TRIAL, 1968, 4 (04): : 54 - &