EFFECTS OF NANOTECHNOLOGY LIQUID FERTILIZERS ON FRUIT SET AND PODS OF BROAD BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Al Antary, Tawfiq M. [1 ]
Kahlel, Abdel-Monnem S. [2 ]
Ghidan, Alaa Y. [3 ]
Asoufi, Hassan M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Sch Agr, Plant Protect Dept, Amman 11942, Jordan
[2] Northern Tech Univ, Tech Agr Coll, Plant Prod Tech Dept, Mosul, Iraq
[3] Aqaba Univ Technol, Pharm Sch, Aqaba 77110, Jordan
[4] Natl Ctr Agr Res, Shuobak, Jordan
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2020年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
Zinc nanoparticles; sulfure nanoparticles; Nanofertilizers; Fruit set; Number of pods; Pod length; Pod weight; Faba bean; PLANTS; ZINC; CHLOROPHYLL; RICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nanotechnology has become a promising way in increasing crop production and plant protection.Nanofertilizer could be an efficient and less cost compared with classic approaches. In this research, to evaluate the efficacy of zinc and sulfur nanoparticles on fruit set,number of pods,pod length,and pod weight of broad bean (Viciafaba L.) an experiment was carried out in the Technical Agricultural College at Mosul in Iraq. Results of the study represent the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles as well high concentration of sulfur nanoparticles as nanofertilizer. There were significant differences between all the treatments except sulfur 50 and the control on the fruit set % of broad bean, but zinc nanomaterial (50ppm) and the two sulfur nanomaterial concentrations (100 and 200ppm) had a significant increasing in the fruit set %. All nanomaterials had an increasing effect on number of bean pods except sulfur50; it did not differ significantly compared with the control. The highest effect was in case of sulfur 200,but did not differ significantly than zinc 50 in number of bean pods.Zinc 50 and sulfur 200 had the greater bean pod length,but without significant differences.Zinc 50 had the greatest bean body weight,but with out significant differences with all treatments except the control.
引用
收藏
页码:4794 / 4798
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pollination efficiency of bumblebees for the faba bean (Vicia faba L.)
    Tasei, JN
    Carre, S
    Le Guen, J
    Morin, G
    INSECT-PLANT INTERACTIONS, 1997, : 35 - 38
  • [32] VIRUS DISEASES OF BROAD BEAN (VICIA-FABA L)
    SIMAY, EI
    NOVENYTERMELES, 1986, 35 (05): : 459 - 468
  • [33] Prediction of Flowering Occurrence in Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)
    Norouzi, Hosein Ajam
    Vazin, Farshid
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2011, 39 (01) : 198 - 207
  • [34] Competition, growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.)
    López-Bellido, FJ
    López-Bellido, L
    López-Bellido, RJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2005, 23 (04) : 359 - 378
  • [35] Quantification of isoflavones in stems of faba bean (Vicia faba L.)
    Beatriz Fuentes-Herrera, Paula
    Delgado-Alvarado, Adriana
    Edgar Herrera-Cabrera, Braulio
    Lorena Luna-Guevara, Marfa
    Isabel Olvera-Hernandez, Jose
    REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2020, 52 (02) : 43 - 51
  • [36] LIMIT DEXTRINASE OF BROAD BEAN (VICIA-FABA-L)
    GORDON, RW
    MANNERS, DJ
    STARK, JR
    CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH, 1975, 42 (01) : 125 - 134
  • [37] Application of the Ecologo-genetic Model in Broad Bean (Vicia faba L.) Breeding
    Kosev, Valentin
    Georgieva, Natalia
    BANATS JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 10 (20) : 29 - 36
  • [38] Nickel Phytoremediation Potential of Broad Bean, Vicia faba L., and Its Biochemical Responses
    S. Srivastava
    S. Mishra
    S. Dwivedi
    V. S. Baghel
    S. Verma
    P. K. Tandon
    U. N. Rai
    R. D. Tripathi
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2005, 74 : 715 - 724
  • [39] The effects of irrigation water salinity level on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) productivity
    Filipovic, Lana
    Romic, Davor
    Ondrasek, Gabrijel
    Mustac, Ivan
    Filipovic, Vilim
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 21 (03): : 537 - 542
  • [40] Effects of seed size and maturity on the growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.)
    Agung, S
    McDonald, GK
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1998, 49 (01): : 79 - 88