共 50 条
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in People With Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia
被引:18
|作者:
Fanning, Laura
[1
,2
]
Lau, Wallis C. Y.
[1
,3
]
Mongkhon, Pajaree
[1
,4
,5
]
Man, Kenneth K. C.
[1
,3
]
Bell, J. Simon
[6
,7
,8
]
Ilomaki, Jenni
[6
,7
]
Darzins, Peteris
[2
]
Lau, Kui Kai
[9
]
Wei, Li
[1
]
Wong, Ian C. K.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] UCL, Sch Pharm, Res Dept Practice & Policy, London, England
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Pharmacol & Pharm, Ctr Safe Medicat Practice & Res, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Naresuan Univ, Dept Pharm Practice, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Safety & Qual Hlth, Muang, Thailand
[5] Univ Phayao, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Muang, Phayao, Thailand
[6] Monash Univ, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Hornsby Ku Ring Gai Hosp, NHMRC Cognit Decline Partnership Ctr, Hornsby, Australia
[9] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Atrial fibrillation;
dementia;
warfarin;
direct oral anticoagulants;
stroke;
bleeding;
ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE;
HEMORRHAGIC STROKE;
RISK;
DABIGATRAN;
ASSOCIATION;
VALIDATION;
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY;
POPULATION;
PREVENTION;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.022
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Objective: To determine risks of embolic events, bleeding, and mortality with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and dementia. Design: New-user retrospective cohort study using The Health Improvement Network database. Setting and Participants: A population-based sample comprising people with AF and dementia prescribed DOACs or warfarin from August 2011 to September 2017. Methods: Risk of ischemic stroke (IS), ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism (IS/ TIA/SE), all-cause mortality, intracranial bleeding (ICB), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and other bleeding were compared for DOACs vs warfarin using propensity score-adjusted Poisson regression. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and absolute risk differences (ARDs) were calculated. Results: Overall, 2399 people with AF and dementia initiated DOACs (42%) or warfarin (58%). Before propensity score adjustment, patients who initiated DOACs were older and had more comorbidities. After adjustment, DOAC initiators demonstrated similar risks of IS, TIA, or SE; IS alone; and other bleeding but reduced ICB risk (IRR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08, 0.86; ARD -5.2, 95% CI -6.5, -1.0, per 1000 personyears) compared with warfarin. Increased risk of GIB (IRR 2.11, 95% CI 1.30, 3.42; ARD 14.8, 95% CI 4.0, 32.4, per 1000 person-years) and all-cause mortality (IRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.60, 2.65; ARD 53.0, 95% CI 30.2, 82.8, per 1000 person-years) were observed in DOAC initiators compared with warfarin. Conclusions and Implications: Among people with AF and dementia, initiating treatment with DOACs compared with warfarin was associated with similar risks of IS, TIA, or SE and IS alone. DOAC-treated patients demonstrated reduced ICB risk but increased GIB and all-cause mortality risks. We cannot exclude the possible impact of residual confounding from channeling of DOACs toward older and sicker people, particularly for the outcome of all-cause mortality. Further safety data are urgently needed to confirm findings. (C) 2019 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / +
页数:13
相关论文