Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation efficacy and lung pressure transmission

被引:37
|
作者
Mukerji, A. [1 ]
Belik, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, McMaster Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat, Div Neonatol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
关键词
NONINVASIVE RESPIRATORY SUPPORT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; MANDATORY VENTILATION; DISTRESS-SYNDROME; CPAP; TRIAL; SURFACTANT; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1038/jp.2015.61
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate carbon dioxide (CO2) clearance, delivered pressures and tidal volume (V-T) during neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) with two commonly used interfaces. STUDY DESIGN: A neonatal lung model, with either short binasal prongs (SBP) or a small caliber nasal cannula (RAM) interface, was tested over a range of clinically relevant settings. A fixed amount of CO2 was infused and the fraction remaining in the lung 100 s postinfusion was measured. Pressure transmission to the lung and V-T was measured at the level of the trachea. RESULT: CO2 elimination was directly proportional to the inspiratory pressure during NIPPV. At peak pressures of 22 to 34 cm H2O, CO2 clearance was greater (P<0.001) with SBP as compared with RAM. Relative to the set ventilator parameters, a substantial pressure dampening effect was documented at the lung level, which was significantly lower with RAM when compared with SBP (2.8% (0.2) versus 11.9% (1.5), P<0.0001). CO2 elimination was dependent on VT and effective despite only a small fraction of physiological V-T (maximum delivered V-T%: SBP 15.5 (0.7) versus RAM 6.1 (1.4), P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: NIPPV promotes CO2 elimination even at low transmitted airway pressures, but less effective with RAM as compared with SBP. CO2 elimination despite small V-T suggests that NIPPV may depend on a non-conventional gas-exchange mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 719
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COMPARISON OF NASAL PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION WITH NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH NOCTURNAL HYPOVENTILATION
    RESTRICK, LJ
    FOX, NC
    BRAID, G
    WARD, EM
    PAUL, EA
    WEDZICHA, JA
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1993, 6 (03) : 364 - 370
  • [12] Supplemental oxygen and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
    Padkin, AJ
    Kinnear, WJM
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (04) : 834 - 836
  • [13] Frequency change in nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
    Lorenz, Judith
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2023, 227 (03): : 164 - 165
  • [14] Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?
    Owen, Louise S.
    Morley, Colin J.
    Davis, Peter G.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2007, 92 (05): : 414 - 418
  • [15] NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION VERSUS NASAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE FOR NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY
    Tang, S.
    Shi, Y.
    Shen, J.
    Hu, Z.
    Li, H.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 260 - 261
  • [16] Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Shi, Y.
    Tang, S.
    Shen, J.
    Li, H.
    KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 2010, 222 : S12 - S12
  • [17] Is Nasal Ventilation a Good Alternative for Invasive Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation?
    Bancalari, E.
    Jain, D.
    NEONATOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) : 271 - 272
  • [18] Determinants of effective ventilation during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
    Parreira, VF
    Jounieaux, V
    Delguste, P
    Aubert, G
    Dury, M
    Rodenstein, DO
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1997, 10 (09) : 1975 - 1982
  • [19] Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in treating apnea of prematurity (AOP)
    Lin, CH
    Tsai, WH
    Lin, YJ
    Wang, ST
    Yeh, TF
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (04) : 2012 - 2012
  • [20] Questions Concerning Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Wang, Li
    Shi, Yuan
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (09) : 872 - 873