Geometry Effect on a Multilateration Air Traffic Surveillance System Performance

被引:0
|
作者
El-Ghoboushi, Mohamed [1 ]
Ghuniem, Atef [1 ]
Gaafar, Abdel-Hamid [2 ]
Abou-Bakr, Hossam El-Din [3 ]
机构
[1] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Ismailia, Egypt
[2] Arab Acad Sci Technol & Maritime Transport, Elect & Commun Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Mil Tech Coll, Dept Commun Engn, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Multilateration; Air traffic surveillance systems; Air traffic control; Dilution of Precision;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Nowadays, many researchers pay much attention to Multilateration localization process in air traffic control. This paper deals with system geometry effect on target localization process. Modifications are proposed in both the sensors deployment network and the algorithm sequence used. The work will be on a 3 steps: First, working on a small cell network taking minimum number of sensors. Different optimal sensor deployment methods will be examined and a pilot area will be chosen from a Multilateration network at Cairo International Airport, 05L Runway (RW). Simulation for a single aircraft is performed and the results are compared. Second, the deployment method that gives the best results in a small cell network will be considered and a new sensors deployment covering an area larger than the existing one is proposed, trying to have the same performance of the existing system with the advantage of decreasing the number of sensors. Simulation is performed again for both the total proposed network and the total existing Multilateration deployment network and the results are compared. Finally, the proposed Multilateration network is divided into 9 main clusters and 4 backup clusters instead of using all sensors in localization process, and the cluster that has the least PDOP (position dilution of precision) is selected. To enhance the localization process only the cluster that has least PDOP < 21 is selected. Otherwise, are rejected.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Air traffic complexity for a distributed air traffic management system
    Brazdilova, S. L.
    Casek, P.
    Kubalcik, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2011, 225 (G6) : 665 - 674
  • [32] A SYSTEM FOR THE AUTOMATIC SURVEILLANCE OF TRAFFIC SITUATIONS
    BOHNKE, P
    PFANNERSTILL, E
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1986, 56 (01): : 41 - 45
  • [33] IMPLEMENTING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
    LALANI, N
    KOCHEVAR, R
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1990, 60 (08): : 25 - 31
  • [34] The Development of Air Traffic Control Surveillance Radars in China
    Chen Xinping
    Chai Yunfeng
    Gao Zhonghui
    2017 IEEE RADAR CONFERENCE (RADARCONF), 2017, : 1776 - 1784
  • [35] Air traffic surveillance - Building capacity and enhancing safety
    MinstMC, Andrew Rose
    Measurement and Control, 2002, 35 (09) : 266 - 270
  • [36] Adaptive Data Fusion for Air Traffic Control Surveillance
    Besada, Juan A.
    Frontera, Guillermo
    Bernardos, Ana M.
    de Miguel, Gonzalo
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PART II, 2011, 6679 : 118 - 126
  • [37] Air traffic surveillance - building capacity and enhancing safety
    Rose, A
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2002, 35 (09): : 266 - 270
  • [38] Air traffic control - Safety, performance, software engineering, system management
    Steeg, M
    6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT I, 2002, : 251 - 256
  • [39] Overall safety performance of the air traffic management system: Indicators and analysis
    Di Gravio, Giulio
    Mancini, Maurizio
    Patriarca, Riccardo
    Costantino, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 44-45 : 65 - 69
  • [40] How to Evaluate the Performance of Military Air Traffic Control System in China
    Wan, Jian
    Xia, Zhenghong
    Zhu, Xinping
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE 4TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2018), 2018, : 1257 - 1261