Clinical and molecular followup after radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:25
|
作者
Oefelein, MG
Ignatoff, JM
Clemens, JQ
Watkin, W
Kaul, KL
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Evanston Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[3] Wright Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1999年 / 162卷 / 02期
关键词
RNA-directed DNA polymerase; polymerase chain reaction; prostate-specific antigen; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68544-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We previously reported evidence of hematogenous dissemination of prostate cells during radical retropubic prostatectomy, and we now provide clinical and molecular reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followup of that patient cohort. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. The prostate specific antigen (PSA) RT-PCR assay was performed on peripheral venous blood samples preoperatively in 101, during surgery in 29, during and up to 12 weeks after surgery in 50 and at least 1 year postoperatively in 65 patients. Correlation with clinical (PSA) indicators of recurrence was performed. Results: Of the 101 patients 9 demonstrated biochemical evidence of prostate cancer progression (median followup 22 months). Of the 50 men with perioperative molecular results the RT-PCR positive rate increased from 22% preoperatively in 11 to 48% in 24 (p = 0.02) and then decreased to 10% in 4 of 40 men at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.07). Molecular followup at a minimum of 1 year after radical retropubic prostatectomy was obtained in 65 men, of whom the RT-PCR positive rate decreased from 23% preoperatively in 14 to 9.2% in 6 (p = 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between a persistently positive RT-PCR result and biochemical failure. Conclusions: Although a significant proportion of men have molecular evidence of hematogenous prostate cell dissemination intraoperatively, longitudinal molecular and clinical followup demonstrates reconversion to a negative status as the predominant trend. At relatively short followup no significant correlation was identified between the RT-PCR result and the PSA progression-free survival.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 310
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Barre, Christian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [42] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR CANCER
    CHUTE, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1954, 71 (03): : 347 - 372
  • [43] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR TUBERCULOSIS
    FRIEDMANN, G
    SHARGEL, G
    LITVAK, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1952, 68 (02): : 523 - 531
  • [44] Radical retropubic prostatectomy - Reply
    Thiel, R
    UROLOGE A, 2004, 43 (06): : 721 - +
  • [45] Descending radical retropubic Prostatectomy
    Fichtner, J.
    Franzaring, L.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2010, 41 (04) : 263 - 270
  • [46] Comparison of the advantages of radical perineal prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Sullivan, LD
    Weir, MJ
    Kinahan, JF
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 1999, 30 (05) : 352 - 357
  • [47] Patient followup after radical prostatectomy by internet medical file
    Cathala, N
    Brillat, F
    Mombet, A
    Lobel, E
    Prapotnich, D
    Alexandre, L
    Vallancien, G
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06): : 2284 - 2287
  • [48] Molecular detection of circulating prostate cancer cells: Five year followup after radical prostatectomy
    Oefelein, MG
    Kaul, KL
    Mangold, KA
    Azizi, R
    Ignatoff, JM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 345 - 345
  • [49] The effect of prostate volume on complications after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Bedir, S
    Kilciler, M
    Erdemir, F
    Coban, H
    Erten, K
    Ozgok, Y
    Peker, AF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 88 - 89
  • [50] GIANT POSTERIOR URETHRAL DIVERTICULUM AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    LAUDONE, VP
    GREEN, KF
    WYKER, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (02): : 364 - 366