Risk-Based Prostate Cancer Screening

被引:92
|
作者
Zhu, Xiaoye [1 ]
Albertsen, Peter C. [2 ]
Andriole, Gerald L. [3 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
Vickers, Andrew J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Surg, Farmington, CT USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Mass screening; Early detection of cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Prostate neoplasms; Nomograms; Risk factors; GLANDULAR KALLIKREIN 2; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; LONG-TERM PREDICTION; ANTIGEN VELOCITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PSA VELOCITY; HIGH-GRADE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; METABOLIC SYNDROME; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Widespread mass screening of prostate cancer (PCa) is not recommended because the balance between benefits and harms is still not well established. The achieved mortality reduction comes with considerable harm such as unnecessary biopsies, overdiagnoses, and overtreatment. Therefore, patient stratification with regard to PCa risk and aggressiveness is necessary to identify those men who are at risk and may actually benefit from early detection. Objective: This review critically examines the current evidence regarding risk-based PCa screening. Evidence acquisition: A search of the literature was performed using the Medline database. Further studies were selected based on manual searches of reference lists and review articles. Evidence synthesis: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be the single most significant predictive factor for identifying men at increased risk of developing PCa. Especially in men with no additional risk factors, PSA alone provides an appropriate marker up to 30 yr into the future. After assessment of an early PSA test, the screening frequency may be determined based on individualized risk. A limited list of additional factors such as age, comorbidity, prostate volume, family history, ethnicity, and previous biopsy status have been identified to modify risk and are important for consideration in routine practice. In men with a known PSA, risk calculators may hold the promise of identifying those who are at increased risk of having PCa and are therefore candidates for biopsy. Conclusions: PSA testing may serve as the foundation for a more risk-based assessment. However, the decision to undergo early PSA testing should be a shared one between the patient and his physician based on information balancing its advantages and disadvantages. (C) 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 661
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE LATEST UPDATES ON CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AND RISK-BASED MANAGEMENT FOR ABNORMAL SCREENING TESTS AND PRECURSORS
    Alelwan, Omar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A350 - A350
  • [42] Risk-based guidelines: Redefining management of abnormal cervical cancer screening results
    Wiser, Amy
    Quinlan, Jeffrey D.
    Batur, Pelin
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 88 (10) : 556 - 560
  • [43] Patient Perspectives on the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool for Lung Cancer Screening
    Megan C. Roberts
    Elizabeth L. Seaman
    William M. P. Klein
    Rebecca A. Ferrer
    Paul K.J. Han
    Hormuzd A. Katki
    Stephanie R. Land
    Robert A. Liotta
    Joel A. Nations
    P. Gabriel Peterson
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2022, 37 : 1438 - 1445
  • [44] Acceptability of risk-based triage in cervical cancer screening: A focus group study
    Bas, Sharell
    Sijben, Jasmijn
    Bischoff, Erik W. M. A.
    Bekkers, Ruud L. M. G.
    de Kok, Inge M. C. M.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Siebers, Albert
    van der Waal, Danielle
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [45] Studies Support Risk-Based Mammography Screening
    Peres, Judy
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (19) : 1428 - 1430
  • [46] Precision Screening for Lung Cancer: Risk-Based but Not Always Preference-Sensitive?
    Gould, Michael K.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [47] Risk-based lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: towards implementation Comment
    ten Haaf, Kevin
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01): : 13 - 14
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China
    Sun, Li
    Legood, Rosa
    Sadique, Zia
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Yang, Li
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2018, 96 (08) : 568 - 577
  • [49] Patient Perspectives on the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool for Lung Cancer Screening
    Roberts, Megan C.
    Seaman, Elizabeth L.
    Klein, William M. P.
    Ferrer, Rebecca A.
    Han, Paul K. J.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    Land, Stephanie R.
    Liotta, Robert A.
    Nations, Joel A.
    Peterson, P. Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (05) : 1438 - 1445
  • [50] Risk-based screening for latent tuberculosis infection
    Haley, Connie A.
    Cain, Kevin P.
    Yu, Chang
    Garman, Katie F.
    Wells, Charles D.
    Laserson, Kayla F.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 101 (02) : 142 - 149