The influence of social network prestige on in-service teachers' learning outcomes in online peer assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Ma, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Du, Lei [2 ,3 ]
Lu, Yao [2 ]
Sun, Yi-Fan [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Adv Innovat Ctr Future Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Sch Educ Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Longhua Songhe Sch, Shenzhen 518109, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
distance education and online learning; teacher professional development; evaluation methodologies; informal learning; learning communities; pedagogical issues; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE; SKILLS; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITIES; ENGAGEMENT; CENTRALITY; PATTERNS; LEARNERS; MOOC;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100087
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Online peer assessment has been widely applied in online teacher training. However, not all learners participate equally, detailed characterization and impact analysis of peer assessment is required. This study draws on a sociological term, social network prestige, to evaluate the participation gap of learners in online peer assessment. A teacher training course was offered to in-service primary and secondary school teachers, and 457 participants were ranked according to their prestige. Then, the top 30% of learners were considered the high-prestige group (142 participants) and the bottom 30% as the low-prestige group (128 participants). Social network analysis and behavioral sequence analysis were used to explore the differences in the learning outcomes of these two groups. The results showed significant differences in learning performance, social network structure and learning behaviors among learners with different prestige. High-prestige learners have better learning performance and are affected by their prior knowledge. Learners with different levels of prestige differ in social network structure and learning behavior. Based on these findings, this study suggests improvements to reduce the participation gap.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An online academic context for in-service teachers: what works?
    Grion, Valentina
    Varisco, Bianca M.
    QWERTY, 2009, 4 (02): : 107 - 122
  • [22] Online academic learning beliefs and strategies: a comparison of preservice and in-service early childhood teachers
    Mou, Tsai-Yun
    Kao, Chia-Pin
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2021, 45 (01) : 65 - 83
  • [23] A SeNA-based study of in-service teachers' interaction patterns in an online learning community
    Zhang, Yixin
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Qi
    DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [24] Effects of Procedural Scaffolding on In-Service Teachers' Peer Feedback Quality and Learning Participation in Lesson Study
    Wang, Axi
    Wu, Lan
    Wang, Dan
    IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT 2021), 2021, : 111 - 113
  • [25] In-service training for technology teachers: A needs assessment
    Reitsma, Gerda
    Mentz, Elsa
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2009, 13 (02) : 15 - 29
  • [26] Identifying a General Structure of Teachers' In-service Learning
    Kuo, Lung-Hsing
    Yang, Hsieh-Hua
    Yang, Hung-Jen
    Chen, Chin-Hsi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 6 (01): : 105 - 113
  • [27] Locating learning in in-service education for preschool teachers
    Adger, CT
    Hoyle, SM
    Dickinson, DK
    AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2004, 41 (04) : 867 - 900
  • [28] THE ROLE OF THE RESEARCHER IN THE LEARNING OF IN-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS
    Guzman, Jose
    Paez, David A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, VOL. 1: DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL THINKING, 2011, : 325 - 325
  • [29] In-service Teachers' Education Program - The influence on teaching
    Markl, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 250 - 250
  • [30] Students' learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment
    Liu, Jin
    Guo, Xiuyan
    Gao, Ruiqin
    Fram, Paul
    Ling, Yu
    Zhang, He
    Wang, Jin
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (06) : 835 - 847