Persistence and desistance of oppositional defiant disorder in a community sample of children with ADHD

被引:69
|
作者
August, GJ [1 ]
Realmuto, GM [1 ]
Joyce, T [1 ]
Hektner, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Div Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY | 1999年 / 38卷 / 10期
关键词
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; conduct disorder; oppositional defiant disorder; comorbidity; persistence; desistance;
D O I
10.1097/00004583-199910000-00015
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the developmental progression of comorbid oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in a community sample of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with particular emphasis on persistence and desistance of ODD and the emergence of new cases of conduct disorder (CD). Method: A sample of disruptive children was identified from a multiple-gate epidemiological screen and stratified into diagnostic subgroups on the basis of a structured interview. A comparison sample of nondisruptive children was also identified. Group comparisons were performed on demographic, descriptive, family history, and clinical characteristics. Changes in rates of ODD symptoms and diagnostic subgroup membership were assessed after a 4-year longitudinal interval. Predictors of diagnostic group persistence were tested. Results: Few differences distinguished diagnostic subgroups at baseline. Of the 43 children with baseline diagnoses of ADHD+ODD, only 1 (2.3%) was found to have developed CD at follow-up. Over time there was a 57% rate of ODD persistence and a 43% rate of ODD desistance. Negative parenting practices and mothers' psychiatric disorders predicted persistence of ODD. Conclusions: There was little evidence to show that ODD acted as a precursor to CD. However, when CD was diagnosed at baseline it was always associated with or preceded by ODD (i.e., prodrome). For a subgroup of children with ADHD, comorbid ODD symptoms are relatively unstable and may represent transient developmental perturbations that have little prognostic significance. For a larger subgroup of children with ADHD, ODD symp toms persist into the adolescent years and are associated with adverse parenting practices.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1270
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Response inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with and without oppositional defiant disorder screened from a community sample
    Van der Meere, J
    Marzocchi, GM
    De Meo, T
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 28 (01) : 459 - 472
  • [33] The latent structure of oppositional defiant disorder in children and adults
    Barry, Tammy D.
    Marcus, David K.
    Barry, Christopher T.
    Coccaro, Emil F.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (12) : 1932 - 1939
  • [34] Impairment in Children With and Without ADHD: Contributions From Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Callous-Unemotional Traits
    Brammer, Whitney A.
    Lee, Steve S.
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2012, 16 (07) : 535 - 543
  • [36] Assessment of oppositional defiant disorder and oppositional behavior in children and adolescents with Down syndrome
    Fuca, Elisa
    Cirillo, Flavia
    Celestini, Laura
    Alfieri, Paolo
    Valentini, Diletta
    Costanzo, Floriana
    Vicari, Stefano
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 13
  • [37] OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER AND CONDUCT DISORDER
    LOEBER, R
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 42 (11): : 1099 - &
  • [38] Dimensionality of oppositional defiant disorder
    Hukkelberg, Silje S.
    Ogden, Terje
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 23 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [39] Oppositional Defiant Disorder as a Clinical Phenotype in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Kenneth D. Gadow
    Carla J. DeVincent
    Deborah A. G. Drabick
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2008, 38 : 1302 - 1310
  • [40] Temperament Differences Among Children with Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder
    Diana Joyce
    Thomas Oakland
    The California School Psychologist, 2005, 10 (1): : 125 - 136