Seasonal nutrient uptake of plant biomass in a constructed wetland treating piggery wastewater effluent

被引:16
|
作者
Lee, S. Y. [1 ]
Maniquiz, M. C. [1 ]
Choi, J. Y. [1 ]
Jeong, S. M. [1 ]
Kim, L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kongju Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cheonan 330717, Chungnamdo, South Korea
关键词
biomass; livestock wastewater; nutrient removal; nutrient uptake; surface flow constructed wetland; REMOVAL; SEDIMENT;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2013.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The surface-flow constructed wetland (CW) located in Nonsan City, South Korea, and constructed as the final stage of a piggery wastewater treatment plant that aims to treat high nutrient content effluent during dry days and stormwater runoff during wet days was monitored from October 2008 to November 2011. This research investigated the seasonal nutrient uptake of plant biomass in the CW and nutrient concentration changes in each treatment region under monsoon and temperate climate conditions. Results showed that the mean total nitrogen removal during summer (June to August) was higher by 13% than in spring (March to May), while total phosphorus removal was higher by 22% in fall (September to November) than in winter (December to February). All plants in the CW reached their maximum biomass coverage and weight in summer and minimum growth in winter. The highest N and P content in plants occurred in September with 583.2 g/m(2) and August with 62.0 g/m(2), respectively. Based on the results, it is recommended that the harvesting of plants should be conducted during the time of the peak nutrient uptake and before the plants release the nutrient content back to the CW. The dependence of nutrient removal efficiency on plants is not so significant. In order to increase the nutrient removal rate by plant uptake, it is suggested that the treatment regions in the CW be covered by plants.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1323
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance of a Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland in Treating Biomethanation Effluent
    Wietlisbach, Stephanie Olivia
    Kothurkar, Nikhil K.
    Ram, Kaavya
    Nair, Revathy
    Harigovind, Sreedhar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE GHTC 2016, 2016, : 847 - 853
  • [42] Monitoring efficacy of constructed wetland for treating domestic effluent - microbiological approach
    Kaushal, M.
    Wani, S. P.
    Patil, M. D.
    Datta, A.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2016, 110 (09): : 1710 - 1715
  • [43] Performance of hybrid constructed wetland systems for treating septic tank effluent
    Cui Li-hua
    Liu Wen
    Zhu Xi-zhen
    Ma Mei
    Huang Xi-hua
    Xia Yan-yang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2006, 18 (04) : 665 - 669
  • [45] Effect On Treating Urban Wastewater Process By Constructed Wetland Method
    Yang, Jian-she
    Ke, Xiao-dan
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-6, 2013, 726-731 : 1778 - 1781
  • [46] Nitrogen removal in an integrated constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater
    Dzakpasu, Mawuli
    Hofmann, Oliver
    Scholz, Miklas
    Harrington, Rory
    Jordan, Siobhan N.
    McCarthy, Valerie
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 46 (07): : 742 - 750
  • [47] Performance of constructed wetland treating wastewater from seafood industry
    Yirong, C
    Puetpaiboon, U
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 49 (5-6) : 289 - 294
  • [48] Treating a lignite pyrolysis wastewater in a constructed subsurface flow wetland
    Wiessner, A
    Kuschk, P
    Stottmeister, U
    Struckmann, D
    Jank, M
    WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (05) : 1296 - 1302
  • [49] A free water surface constructed wetland in treating sugarcane wastewater
    Batubara D.S.
    Adrian D.D.
    Journal of Environmental Systems, 2011, 33 (01): : 71 - 86
  • [50] EVALUATION OF A SURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING ABATTOIR WASTEWATER
    Carreau, R.
    VanAcker, S.
    VanderZaag, A. C.
    Madani, A.
    Drizo, A.
    Jamieson, R.
    Gordon, R. J.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (05) : 757 - 766