Midterm Results After Perineal Stapled Prolapse Resection for External Rectal Prolapse

被引:22
|
作者
Sehmer, Diana [1 ]
Marti, Lukas [2 ]
Wolff, Katja [2 ]
Hetzer, Franc H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp Schaffhausen, Surg Clin, CH-8208 Schaffhausen, Switzerland
[2] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Surg, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Rectal prolapse; Surgical therapy; Perineal stapled prolapse resection; Perineal approach; Contour Transtar; MANAGEMENT; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826cbbea
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse improves continence and has short operation times and low complication rates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the midterm recurrence rates, functional results, and patient satisfaction after perineal stapled prolapse resection. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was performed at a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. PATIENTS: From November 2007 to October 2011, a total of 56 consecutive patients were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence rates, functional results according to the Wexner incontinence scale, and patient satisfaction using a visual analog scale were determined RESULTS: The median age was 78.5 years (range, 24-94 years), and 2 patients were men. Midterm results were available for 46 (82%) of 56 patients after a median follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 2-47 months). In 10 cases (18%) data collection was not possible. The recurrence rate at 3 years was 19.7% (95% CI 4.2%-32.7%). The Wexner incontinence score improved from a median of 14.5 presurgery to 4.0 points (p < 0.0001) after surgery. Twenty-five patients (54%) stated that their bowel movements were regular postoperatively. On a visual analog scale that measured satisfaction, the median patient score was 9 (range, 0-10), indicating high patient satisfaction. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included the retrospective study design and the lack of clinical examinations to determine recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal stapled prolapse resection is an alternative technique for treating rectal prolapse with a recurrence rate similar to the Altemeier-Mikulicz or Delorme procedures. This technique is a quick and reliable procedure for use in patients with advanced age.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 96
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERINEAL RECTOPEXY FOR RECTAL PROLAPSE
    WYATT, AP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (10) : 717 - 719
  • [42] Treatment of rectocele and internal rectal prolapse by transanal resection with stapled anastomosis
    Pigot, F
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 2004, 141 (05): : 308 - 310
  • [43] STAPLED LAPAROSCOPIC RECTOPEXY FOR RECTAL PROLAPSE
    DARZI, A
    HENRY, MM
    GUILLOU, PJ
    SHORVON, P
    MONSON, JRT
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1995, 9 (03): : 301 - 303
  • [44] The laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy for the Treatment of external Rectal Prolapse
    Axt, S.
    Falch, C.
    Mueller, S.
    Kirschniak, A.
    Glatzle, J.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2015, 140 (03): : 255 - 258
  • [45] STAPLED LAPAROSCOPIC RECTOPEXY FOR RECTAL PROLAPSE
    DARZI, A
    HILL, A
    MENZIESGOW, N
    HENRY, MM
    MONSON, JRT
    GUILLOU, PJ
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (04) : A7 - A7
  • [46] FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER TREATMENT OF RECTAL PROLAPSE WITH RECTOPEXY AND SIGMOID RESECTION
    HUBER, FT
    STEIN, H
    SIEWERT, JR
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 19 (01) : 138 - 143
  • [48] Late bleeding after stapled procedures for hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse
    Lenisa, L
    Rusconi, A
    Mascheroni, L
    Andreoli, M
    Megevand, J
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (05) : 768 - 769
  • [49] Perineal rectosigmoid resection for exteriorized rectal prolapse (Altemeier's operation)
    Regenet, N
    de Kerviler, B
    Lehur, PA
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 2001, 138 (03): : 153 - 156
  • [50] External fixation of the rectum - evolution of a new perineal procedure for rectal prolapse
    Williams, NS
    Giordano, P
    Huang, A
    Dvorkin, LS
    Hetzer, F
    Scott, SM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 : 138 - 138