The Classification of Grassland Types Based on Object-Based Image Analysis with Multisource Data

被引:21
|
作者
Xu, Dawei [1 ]
Chen, Baorui [1 ]
Shen, Beibei [1 ]
Wang, Xu [1 ]
Yan, Yuchun [1 ]
Xu, Lijun [1 ]
Xin, Xiaoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Hulunber Grassland Ecosyst Observat & Res Stn, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
classification; grassland type; machine learning; OBIA; remote sensing; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; MAPPING LAND-COVER; ALPINE GRASSLAND; MODIS DATA; VEGETATION; DISCRIMINATION; MULTISENSOR; RETRIEVAL; PATTERNS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.rama.2018.11.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The spatial distribution of different grassland types is important for effectively analyzing spatial patterns, obtaining key vegetation parameters using remote sensing (e.g., biomass, leaf area index, net primary production), and using and protecting grasslands. Existing classifications of grasslands by remote sensing are mostly divided according to the fractional vegetation cover or biomass, but classifications according to grassland types are scarce. In this study, we focused on the classification of different grassland types using remote sensing based on object-based image analysis (OBIA) with multitemporal images in combination with a 30-m digital elevation model (DEM) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The grasslands were located in Hulunber, Inner Mongolia, and an autonomous region of China. The support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RE) machine learning classifiers were selected for the classification. The results revealed the following: 1) It is feasible to generally extract different grassland types on the basis of OBIA with multisource data; the overall classification accuracy and Kappa value exceeded 90% and 0.9, respectively, using the SVM and RE machine teaming classifiers, and the classification accuracy of the different grassland types ranged from 61.64% to 98.71%; 2) Multitemporal images and auxiliary data (DEM and NDVI) improved the separability of different grassland types. The information in the growing season was conducive for distinguishing temperate meadow steppe from temperate steppe and was favorable for extracting lowland meadow and swamp in the nongrowing season. The DEM and NDVI also effectively reduced the number of image segmentation objects and improved the segmentation effects; 3) Spectral and textural features were more important than geometric features in this study. A few main variables played a major role in the classification, while a large number of variables had either no significant effect or a negative effect on the classification results when the optimal feature subset was determined. This study provides a scientific basis and reference for the classification of various grassland types by remote sensing, including the data selection, image segmentation, feature selection, classifier selection, and parameter settings. (C) 2018 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 326
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Image segmentation for the purpose of object-based classification
    Darwish, A
    Leukert, K
    Reinhardt, W
    IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 2039 - 2041
  • [12] AN OBJECT-BASED METHOD FOR CHINESE LANDFORM TYPES CLASSIFICATION
    Ding, Hu
    Fei, Tao
    Wufan, Zhao
    Jiaming, N. A.
    Guo'an, Tang
    XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION VII, 2016, 41 (B7): : 213 - 217
  • [13] Optimum Selection of Image Object Attributes for Object-Based Image Analysis and High Classification Accuracy
    Khadanga, Ganesh
    Jain, Kamal
    COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING, CVIP 2023, PT II, 2024, 2010 : 237 - 251
  • [14] Object-based classification of mixed forest types in Mongolia
    Nyamjargal, E.
    Amarsaikhan, D.
    Munkh-Erdene, A.
    Battsengel, V.
    Bolorchuluun, Ch.
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 35 (14) : 1615 - 1626
  • [15] The effect of input data transformations on object-based image analysis
    Lippitt, Christopher D.
    Coulter, Lloyd L.
    Freeman, Mary
    Lamantia-Bishop, Jeffrey
    Pang, Wyson
    Stow, Douglas A.
    REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2012, 3 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [16] Requirements for labelling forest polygons in an object-based image analysis classification
    MacLean, Meghan Graham
    Campbell, Michael J.
    Maynard, Daniel S.
    Ducey, Mark J.
    Congalton, Russell G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (07) : 2531 - 2547
  • [17] Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis
    Dragut, Lucian
    Blaschke, Thomas
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2006, 81 (3-4) : 330 - 344
  • [18] Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation
    Blaschke, T
    2003 IEEE WORKSHOP ON ADVANCES IN TECHNIQUES FOR ANALYSIS OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA, 2004, : 113 - 119
  • [19] MAPPING ERODED AREAS ON MOUNTAIN GRASSLAND WITH TERRESTRIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND OBJECT-BASED IMAGE ANALYSIS
    Mayr, Andreas
    Rutzinger, Martin
    Bremer, Magnus
    Geitner, Clemens
    XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION V, 2016, 3 (05): : 137 - 144
  • [20] PIXEL VS OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR LIDAR INTENSITY DATA
    El-Ashmawy, Nagwa
    Shaker, Ahmed
    Yan, Wai Yeung
    ISPRS WORKSHOP LASER SCANNING 2011, 2011, 38-5 (W12): : 43 - 48