Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur fractures

被引:3
|
作者
Makaram, Navnit S. [1 ,2 ]
Ross, Lauren A. [1 ]
Keenan, Oisin J. F. [1 ]
Magill, Matthew [2 ]
Moran, Matt
Scott, Chloe E. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Periprosthetic; Total Knee arthroplasty; Prognosis; Predictors; Knee Replacement; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMORAL FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; MORTALITY; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aims to determine which Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture (PDFF) classifica-tion system is the most reliable. The secondary aim was to determine which classification system corre-lated most accurately with the surgical management recommended and delivered. Methods: Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients with 83 PDFFs that extended to the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Age, BMI, time from TKA, operative management, and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were collected, and AP and lateral radiographs used to classify all fractures using seven established clas-sification systems by two observers blinded to management. In patients treated operatively ( n = 69), preoperative radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons with expertise in trauma and knee revision who recommended fixation or distal femoral replacement (DFR) requirement. Results: Mean age was 80.7 years (SD9.4) and 50 (84.7%) were female. PDFFs occurred at a mean 9.5 years (SD5.2) after primary TKA. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years (SD2.9). Management was fixation in 47, DFR in 22 and non-operative for 14. The Fakler classification demonstrated highest interobserver reliabil-ity (ICC = 0.948), followed by the Rorabeck (ICC = 0.903), UCS (ICC = 0.850) and Chen (ICC = 0.906). The Neer classification demonstrated weakest agreement (ICC = 0.633). Overall accuracy of predicting DFR require-ment (as determined by two experts) was highest for the Fakler system (83.9%). Compared with actual management delivered the Rorabeck system was most accurate (94.1%). Multivariate regression demon-strated that the ultimate need for DFR ( n = 22) was independently associated with medial comminution (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI), p = 0.027) and fractures distal to the anterior flange and posterior condyle of the femoral component (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31), p = 0.024). Conclusion: The Fakler classification showed highest interobserver agreement and was most accurately predictive of the management recommended by two experts. No classification system accurately pre-dicted the fractures that required DFR, and none included medial comminution which was independently associated with DFR requirement. There remains a need for a PDFF classification system that reliably guides operative management of PDFFs. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3430 / 3437
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In Brief: Classifications in Brief: Vancouver Classification of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures
    Gaski, Greg E.
    Scully, Sean P.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (05) : 1507 - 1510
  • [42] Periprosthetic fractures of the femur - An analysis of 93 fractures
    Beals, RK
    Tower, SS
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1996, (327) : 238 - 246
  • [43] Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate?
    Streubel, P. N.
    Gardner, M. J.
    Morshed, S.
    Collinge, C. A.
    Gallagher, B.
    Ricci, W. M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (04): : 527 - 534
  • [44] Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures: Current Concepts and Management Strategies
    Palanisami, Dhanasekara Raja
    Asif, Imran
    Perumal, Ramesh
    Sundaram, Velmurugesan Purnaganapathi
    Jayaramaraju, Dheenadayalan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025,
  • [45] FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL FEMUR
    SEINSHEIMER, F
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1980, (153) : 169 - 179
  • [46] Distal fractures of the femur
    Tscherne, H
    Schandelmaier, P
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (06): : 427 - 427
  • [47] Distal fractures of the femur
    Schandelmaier, P
    Gössling, T
    Partenheimer, A
    Krettek, C
    CHIRURG, 2002, 73 (12): : 1221 - 1234
  • [48] Preliminary testing of a novel bilateral plating technique for treating periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur
    Muizelaar, Aaron
    Winemaker, Mitchell J.
    Quenneville, Cheryl E.
    Wohl, Gregory R.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 30 (09) : 921 - 926
  • [49] Should megaprosthesis implants be a viable option in elderly patients after distal femur and periprosthetic distal femur fractures?-a retrospective cohort study
    Risitano, Salvatore
    D'Antonio, Davide
    Bosco, Francesco
    Giustra, Fortunato
    Rocca, Fabio
    Capella, Marcello
    Sabatini, Luigi
    Masse, Alessandro
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2023, 8
  • [50] Should megaprosthesis implants be a viable option in elderly patients after distal femur and periprosthetic distal femur fractures?-a retrospective cohort study
    Risitano, Salvatore
    D'Antonio, Davide
    Bosco, Francesco
    Giustra, Fortunato
    Rocca, Fabio
    Capella, Marcello
    Sabatini, Luigi
    Masse, Alessandro
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2023, 8